{"title":"A dichotomy phenomenon for bad minus normed Dirichlet","authors":"Dmitry Kleinbock, Anurag Rao","doi":"10.1112/mtk.12221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given a norm ν on <math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$\\mathbb {R}^2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, the set of ν-Dirichlet improvable numbers <math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>DI</mi>\n <mi>ν</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\mathbf {DI}_\\nu$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> was defined and studied in the papers (Andersen and Duke, <i>Acta Arith</i>. 198 (2021) 37–75 and Kleinbock and Rao, <i>Internat. Math. Res. Notices</i> 2022 (2022) 5617–5657). When ν is the supremum norm, <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>DI</mi>\n <mi>ν</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mi>BA</mi>\n <mo>∪</mo>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathbf {DI}_\\nu = \\mathbf {BA}\\cup {\\mathbb {Q}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, where <math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>BA</mi>\n <annotation>$\\mathbf {BA}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is the set of badly approximable numbers. Each of the sets <math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>DI</mi>\n <mi>ν</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\mathbf {DI}_\\nu$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, like <math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>BA</mi>\n <annotation>$\\mathbf {BA}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, is of measure zero and satisfies the winning property of Schmidt. Hence for every norm ν, <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>BA</mi>\n <mo>∩</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>DI</mi>\n <mi>ν</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathbf {BA} \\cap \\mathbf {DI}_\\nu$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is winning and thus has full Hausdorff dimension. In this article, we prove the following dichotomy phenomenon: either <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>BA</mi>\n <mo>⊂</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>DI</mi>\n <mi>ν</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathbf {BA} \\subset \\mathbf {DI}_\\nu$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> or else <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>BA</mi>\n <mo>∖</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>DI</mi>\n <mi>ν</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathbf {BA} \\setminus \\mathbf {DI}_\\nu$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> has full Hausdorff dimension. We give several examples for each of the two cases. The dichotomy is based on whether the <i>critical locus</i> of ν intersects a precompact <math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>g</mi>\n <mi>t</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$g_t$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-orbit, where <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>{</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>g</mi>\n <mi>t</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>}</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\lbrace g_t\\rbrace$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is the one-parameter diagonal subgroup of <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mo>SL</mo>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\operatorname{SL}_2({\\mathbb {R}})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> acting on the space <i>X</i> of unimodular lattices in <math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$\\mathbb {R}^2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. Thus, the aforementioned dichotomy follows from the following dynamical statement: for a lattice <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Λ</mi>\n <mo>∈</mo>\n <mi>X</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\Lambda \\in X$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, either <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>g</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </msub>\n <mi>Λ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$g_\\mathbb {R} \\Lambda$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is unbounded (and then any precompact <math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>g</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mo>></mo>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$g_{\\mathbb {R}_{>0}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-orbit must eventually avoid a neighborhood of Λ), or not, in which case the set of lattices in <i>X</i> whose <math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>g</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mo>></mo>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$g_{\\mathbb {R}_{>0}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-trajectories are precompact and contain Λ in their closure has full Hausdorff dimension.</p>","PeriodicalId":18463,"journal":{"name":"Mathematika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematika","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1112/mtk.12221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Given a norm ν on , the set of ν-Dirichlet improvable numbers was defined and studied in the papers (Andersen and Duke, Acta Arith. 198 (2021) 37–75 and Kleinbock and Rao, Internat. Math. Res. Notices 2022 (2022) 5617–5657). When ν is the supremum norm, , where is the set of badly approximable numbers. Each of the sets , like , is of measure zero and satisfies the winning property of Schmidt. Hence for every norm ν, is winning and thus has full Hausdorff dimension. In this article, we prove the following dichotomy phenomenon: either or else has full Hausdorff dimension. We give several examples for each of the two cases. The dichotomy is based on whether the critical locus of ν intersects a precompact -orbit, where is the one-parameter diagonal subgroup of acting on the space X of unimodular lattices in . Thus, the aforementioned dichotomy follows from the following dynamical statement: for a lattice , either is unbounded (and then any precompact -orbit must eventually avoid a neighborhood of Λ), or not, in which case the set of lattices in X whose -trajectories are precompact and contain Λ in their closure has full Hausdorff dimension.
期刊介绍:
Mathematika publishes both pure and applied mathematical articles and has done so continuously since its founding by Harold Davenport in the 1950s. The traditional emphasis has been towards the purer side of mathematics but applied mathematics and articles addressing both aspects are equally welcome. The journal is published by the London Mathematical Society, on behalf of its owner University College London, and will continue to publish research papers of the highest mathematical quality.