Teachers beliefs and practices for the teaching of writing in the New Zealand elementary school: influences on student progress

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Helen Walls, Michael Johnston
{"title":"Teachers beliefs and practices for the teaching of writing in the New Zealand elementary school: influences on student progress","authors":"Helen Walls, Michael Johnston","doi":"10.1080/19404158.2023.2208145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the present study, the effects of teachers’ beliefs and practices about writing pedagogy on students' progress were investigated in the context of the New Zealand primary school system. A total of 626 teachers completed a survey on their beliefs and practices. Principal component analysis of beliefs isolated three dimensions, reflecting valuation of (i) explicit, (ii) socio-cultural and (iii) process-writing approaches. Analysis of the practices data isolated six dimensions: (i) explicit and structured approaches; (ii) socio-cultural and process writing approaches; (iii) attention to surface features; (iv) advanced writing practices; (v) basic writing practices, and (vi) teacher goal selection. Next, a sub-sample of 19 survey respondents supplied writing samples from their students, at two time points, allowing for the measurement of progress over time. Associations between teachers’ scale locations for reported beliefs and practices, and their students’ progress were explored. Explicit teaching beliefs and practices were positively correlated with progress and socio-cultural practices were negatively correlated with progress. Our findings support the use of explicit methods for the teaching of writing and cast some doubt over the efficacy of constructivist approaches.","PeriodicalId":44419,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties","volume":"28 1","pages":"27 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2023.2208145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the present study, the effects of teachers’ beliefs and practices about writing pedagogy on students' progress were investigated in the context of the New Zealand primary school system. A total of 626 teachers completed a survey on their beliefs and practices. Principal component analysis of beliefs isolated three dimensions, reflecting valuation of (i) explicit, (ii) socio-cultural and (iii) process-writing approaches. Analysis of the practices data isolated six dimensions: (i) explicit and structured approaches; (ii) socio-cultural and process writing approaches; (iii) attention to surface features; (iv) advanced writing practices; (v) basic writing practices, and (vi) teacher goal selection. Next, a sub-sample of 19 survey respondents supplied writing samples from their students, at two time points, allowing for the measurement of progress over time. Associations between teachers’ scale locations for reported beliefs and practices, and their students’ progress were explored. Explicit teaching beliefs and practices were positively correlated with progress and socio-cultural practices were negatively correlated with progress. Our findings support the use of explicit methods for the teaching of writing and cast some doubt over the efficacy of constructivist approaches.
新西兰小学教师写作教学的信念与实践:对学生进步的影响
摘要本研究以新西兰小学系统为背景,考察了教师对写作教学法的信念和实践对学生进步的影响。共有626名教师完成了一项关于其信仰和实践的调查。信念的主成分分析分离了三个维度,反映了对(i)显性、(ii)社会文化和(iii)过程写作方法的评价。对做法数据的分析分离出六个方面:(一)明确和结构化的方法;(ii)社会文化和过程写作方法;(iii)注意表面特征;(iv)先进的写作方法;(v) 基本写作实践,以及(vi)教师目标选择。接下来,由19名受访者组成的子样本在两个时间点提供了学生的写作样本,以衡量一段时间内的进步。研究了教师报告的信念和实践的量表位置与学生进步之间的关系。明确的教学信念和实践与进步呈正相关,社会文化实践与进步负相关。我们的研究结果支持在写作教学中使用显性方法,并对建构主义方法的有效性提出了一些质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信