A combinatorial theory of institutional invention – ERRATUM

IF 2.2 1区社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

International Theory Pub Date : 2023-06-05 DOI:10.1017/s1752971923000088

Guillaume Beaumier, Marielle Papin, J. Morin

引用次数: 1

Abstract

© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. Cite this article: Beaumier, G., Papin, M., Morin, J.-F. 2023. “A combinatorial theory of institutional invention – ERRATUM.” International Theory 1–1, doi:10.1017/S1752971923000088 International Theory (2023), page 1 of 1 doi:10.1017/S1752971923000088

查看原文本刊更多论文

制度发明的组合理论——ERRATUM

©作者，2023。剑桥大学出版社出版。这是一篇开放获取的文章，在知识共享署名许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)的条款下分发，该许可允许不受限制的重复使用、分发和复制，前提是原始文章被适当引用。本文引自:博米耶，G.，帕平，M.，莫林，J.-F.。2023. 制度发明的组合理论-勘误。国际理论1 - 1,doi:10.1017/S1752971923000088 International Theory (2023)， page 1 of 1 doi:10.1017/S1752971923000088

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Theory Multiple-

CiteScore

6.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Editorial board International Theory (IT) is a peer reviewed journal which promotes theoretical scholarship about the positive, legal, and normative aspects of world politics respectively. IT is open to theory of absolutely all varieties and from all disciplines, provided it addresses problems of politics, broadly defined and pertains to the international. IT welcomes scholarship that uses evidence from the real world to advance theoretical arguments. However, IT is intended as a forum where scholars can develop theoretical arguments in depth without an expectation of extensive empirical analysis. IT’s over-arching goal is to promote communication and engagement across theoretical and disciplinary traditions. IT puts a premium on contributors’ ability to reach as broad an audience as possible, both in the questions they engage and in their accessibility to other approaches. This might be done by addressing problems that can only be understood by combining multiple disciplinary discourses, like institutional design, or practical ethics; or by addressing phenomena that have broad ramifications, like civilizing processes in world politics, or the evolution of environmental norms. IT is also open to work that remains within one scholarly tradition, although in that case authors must make clear the horizon of their arguments in relation to other theoretical approaches.