Appropriations of Social Psychological Studies in Genocide Research Exemplified by References to Solomon E. Asch’s Study of Independence and Conformity

IF 2.6 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Christian Gudehus
{"title":"Appropriations of Social Psychological Studies in Genocide Research Exemplified by References to Solomon E. Asch’s Study of Independence and Conformity","authors":"Christian Gudehus","doi":"10.1080/14623528.2021.1987039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It seems to have become an unquestioned standard in genocide research to abbreviate a very limited number of mainly social psychological studies to help explain that individuals commit violent acts in the context of collective violence. This exemplary review of adaptations of Solomon E. Asch’s studies on independence and conformity hopes to reveal some fundamental problems of supposedly transdisciplinary genocide research and beyond: (1) Asch's originally very elaborate arguments are seriously abbreviated; (2) especially the scope of Asch’s experimental research is not sufficiently contextualized as (3) are his psychological findings, a problem that (4) can be associated with a lack of references to the discussions in the disciplines consulted. These observations do not merely apply to the case under discussion but hint at fundamental problems of inter- or transdisciplinary research on violence.","PeriodicalId":46849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genocide Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"216 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genocide Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2021.1987039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT It seems to have become an unquestioned standard in genocide research to abbreviate a very limited number of mainly social psychological studies to help explain that individuals commit violent acts in the context of collective violence. This exemplary review of adaptations of Solomon E. Asch’s studies on independence and conformity hopes to reveal some fundamental problems of supposedly transdisciplinary genocide research and beyond: (1) Asch's originally very elaborate arguments are seriously abbreviated; (2) especially the scope of Asch’s experimental research is not sufficiently contextualized as (3) are his psychological findings, a problem that (4) can be associated with a lack of references to the discussions in the disciplines consulted. These observations do not merely apply to the case under discussion but hint at fundamental problems of inter- or transdisciplinary research on violence.
种族灭绝研究中社会心理学研究的挪用——以所罗门·e·阿希的独立与从众研究为例
在种族灭绝研究中,简化数量非常有限的主要是社会心理学的研究,以帮助解释个人在集体暴力的背景下实施暴力行为,似乎已经成为一种毋庸置疑的标准。这篇对所罗门·e·阿希(Solomon E. Asch)关于独立与从众的研究的改编的典范性评论,希望揭示一些被认为是跨学科的种族灭绝研究及其以外的基本问题:(1)阿希原本非常详尽的论点被严重地缩短了;(2)特别是Asch的实验研究的范围没有充分的背景化(3)是他的心理学发现,这个问题(4)可能与缺乏参考学科的讨论有关。这些观察结果不仅适用于正在讨论的案件,而且暗示了关于暴力的跨学科或跨学科研究的基本问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genocide Research
Journal of Genocide Research POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信