Piecewise Propensity Score Analysis: A New Method for Conducting Propensity Score Matching With Polytomous Ordinal Independent Variables

Robert G. Bodily, Ross Larsen, Russell T Warne
{"title":"Piecewise Propensity Score Analysis: A New Method for Conducting Propensity Score Matching With Polytomous Ordinal Independent Variables","authors":"Robert G. Bodily, Ross Larsen, Russell T Warne","doi":"10.1037/arc0000035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One common purpose of research is to determine the effect of an intervention on an outcome. The gold standard for determining effects is a randomized control trial. A randomized control trial controls for unmeasured variables that may affect the outcome by randomly placing participants in either a treatment or control condition. This works well in cases in which participants can be randomized, but in many cases it is impossible to do so. For example, assigning people to psychological conditions, race, or gender is impossible. To address this, many people use a procedure called propensity score matching (PSM). One current method that is used for PSM is marginal mean weighting through stratification. This analysis is complicated to conduct and suffers from other disadvantages. To address these concerns, we propose a new method to conduct PSM called piecewise propensity score analysis (PPSA). PPSA is a method that can assist researchers in identifying causal effects when random assignment is not possible. Creating methods to accurately determine the effect of interventions is extremely important in educational research, psychological research, and behavioral and cognitive science research. PPSA is a method that can support researchers and practitioners in trying to understand human processes in order to improve them. S C I E N T I F I C A B S T R A C T Propensity score analysis is widely used for simulating random assignment in observational studies when true random assignment is not possible. In propensity score modeling, a number of covariates are used to estimate the probability that an individual will belong to 1 of 2 groups. Prospective participants are then matched on their probabilities of belonging to the 2 groups rather than on the exact set of covariate values (as in traditional matching methods). However, traditional propensity score analysis can only be used in studies with 2 groups, such as an experimental and a control group. In this article, we propose a new method called piecewise propensity score analysis (PPSA) for ordinal polytomous grouping variables. We compared PPSA with another method of conducting propensity score analysis with ordered categories, marginal mean weighting through stratification (MMW-S; Hong, 2010, 2012) in a 3 5 4 study across three model misspecification conditions, five matching methods, and four sample sizes (1,000, 5,000, 10,000, 21,753). We found no significant difference between PPSA and MMW-S methods across conditions. We recommend linear regression, simple mean difference, or propensity stratification methods for simulating causal inference.","PeriodicalId":89891,"journal":{"name":"Archives of scientific psychology","volume":"6 1","pages":"14–20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of scientific psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

One common purpose of research is to determine the effect of an intervention on an outcome. The gold standard for determining effects is a randomized control trial. A randomized control trial controls for unmeasured variables that may affect the outcome by randomly placing participants in either a treatment or control condition. This works well in cases in which participants can be randomized, but in many cases it is impossible to do so. For example, assigning people to psychological conditions, race, or gender is impossible. To address this, many people use a procedure called propensity score matching (PSM). One current method that is used for PSM is marginal mean weighting through stratification. This analysis is complicated to conduct and suffers from other disadvantages. To address these concerns, we propose a new method to conduct PSM called piecewise propensity score analysis (PPSA). PPSA is a method that can assist researchers in identifying causal effects when random assignment is not possible. Creating methods to accurately determine the effect of interventions is extremely important in educational research, psychological research, and behavioral and cognitive science research. PPSA is a method that can support researchers and practitioners in trying to understand human processes in order to improve them. S C I E N T I F I C A B S T R A C T Propensity score analysis is widely used for simulating random assignment in observational studies when true random assignment is not possible. In propensity score modeling, a number of covariates are used to estimate the probability that an individual will belong to 1 of 2 groups. Prospective participants are then matched on their probabilities of belonging to the 2 groups rather than on the exact set of covariate values (as in traditional matching methods). However, traditional propensity score analysis can only be used in studies with 2 groups, such as an experimental and a control group. In this article, we propose a new method called piecewise propensity score analysis (PPSA) for ordinal polytomous grouping variables. We compared PPSA with another method of conducting propensity score analysis with ordered categories, marginal mean weighting through stratification (MMW-S; Hong, 2010, 2012) in a 3 5 4 study across three model misspecification conditions, five matching methods, and four sample sizes (1,000, 5,000, 10,000, 21,753). We found no significant difference between PPSA and MMW-S methods across conditions. We recommend linear regression, simple mean difference, or propensity stratification methods for simulating causal inference.
分段倾向得分分析:一种与多序自变量进行倾向得分匹配的新方法
研究的一个共同目的是确定干预对结果的影响。确定效果的黄金标准是随机对照试验。随机对照试验通过将参与者随机置于治疗组或对照组来控制可能影响结果的未测量变量。这在参与者可以随机分配的情况下很有效,但在许多情况下是不可能这样做的。例如,将人们划分为心理状况、种族或性别是不可能的。为了解决这个问题,许多人使用一种称为倾向得分匹配(PSM)的方法。目前用于PSM的一种方法是通过分层进行边际平均加权。这种分析进行起来很复杂,而且还有其他缺点。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了一种新的PSM方法,即分段倾向得分分析(PPSA)。PPSA是一种方法,可以帮助研究人员确定因果关系时,随机分配是不可能的。在教育研究、心理学研究以及行为和认知科学研究中,创造方法来准确地确定干预措施的效果是极其重要的。PPSA是一种方法,可以支持研究人员和从业者试图了解人类过程,以改善他们。在观察性研究中,当不可能进行真正的随机分配时,倾向得分分析被广泛用于模拟随机分配。在倾向得分模型中,使用一些协变量来估计个体属于两个群体中的一个的概率。然后,根据他们属于两组的概率对潜在参与者进行匹配,而不是根据协变量值的精确集合(如传统匹配方法)。然而,传统的倾向评分分析只能用于两组研究,如实验组和对照组。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的方法,称为分段倾向得分分析(PPSA)的有序多同组变量。我们比较了PPSA与另一种进行有序分类倾向得分分析的方法,通过分层的边际平均加权(MMW-S;Hong, 2010, 2012)在一项涉及三种模型错配条件、五种匹配方法和四种样本量(1,000,5,000,10,000,21,753)的354研究中。我们发现PPSA和毫米波- s方法在不同条件下没有显著差异。我们推荐线性回归、简单平均差或倾向分层方法来模拟因果推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书