Representations of guidance counselors, psychologists, and psychoeducators regarding psychological assessment

IF 1.3 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.erap.2022.100821

Sabruna Dorceus, Yann Le Corff, Éric Yergeau

{"title":"Representations of guidance counselors, psychologists, and psychoeducators regarding psychological assessment","authors":"Sabruna Dorceus, Yann Le Corff, Éric Yergeau","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2022.100821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Social representations related to collaborative/therapeutic and information-gathering assessment could explain some psychological assessment practices. However, no other study has attempted to examine the actual place of these models in psychological assessment practices.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The goal of this study was to examine the social representations of different groups of professionals with regard to their preferred approach to psychological assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>A latent profile analysis was conducted on a sample of licensed Canadian guidance counselors (</span><em>n</em>  =235), and psychoeducators (<em>n</em>  <!-->97).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results revealed three psychological assessment profiles, which significantly differ in terms of a few social factors. Results also showed that some psychological assessment practices differ across profiles.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study provides a better understanding of psychometric instruments users’ approaches to assessment and the influence of social factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S116290882200072X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Social representations related to collaborative/therapeutic and information-gathering assessment could explain some psychological assessment practices. However, no other study has attempted to examine the actual place of these models in psychological assessment practices.

Objective

The goal of this study was to examine the social representations of different groups of professionals with regard to their preferred approach to psychological assessment.

Method

A latent profile analysis was conducted on a sample of licensed Canadian guidance counselors (n = 382), psychologists (n = 235), and psychoeducators (n = 97).

Results

Results revealed three psychological assessment profiles, which significantly differ in terms of a few social factors. Results also showed that some psychological assessment practices differ across profiles.

Conclusion

This study provides a better understanding of psychometric instruments users’ approaches to assessment and the influence of social factors.

查看原文本刊更多论文

指导顾问、心理学家和心理教育工作者关于心理评估的陈述

引言与合作/治疗和信息收集评估相关的社会表征可以解释一些心理评估实践。然而，没有其他研究试图检验这些模型在心理评估实践中的实际地位。目的本研究的目的是检验不同专业群体的社会表征，以了解他们对心理评估的偏好。方法对持有执照的加拿大指导顾问（n=382）、心理学家（n=235）和心理教育工作者（n=97）进行潜在特征分析。研究结果还表明，一些心理评估实践因个人情况而异。结论本研究有助于更好地了解心理测量仪器使用者的评估方法以及社会因素的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim of the Revue européenne de Psychologie appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology is to promote high-quality applications of psychology to all areas of specialization, and to foster exchange among researchers and professionals. Its policy is to attract a wide range of contributions, including empirical research, overviews of target issues, case studies, descriptions of instruments for research and diagnosis, and theoretical work related to applied psychology. In all cases, authors will refer to published and verificable facts, whether established in the study being reported or in earlier publications.