Sterile versus clean urinary catheterisation is not associated with post-transplantation infection

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
Samantha Jolly MBBS, MS, Stefan Court-Kowalski MBBS, PhD, Victoria Lu MBBS, MT, Matthew Roberts MBBS, FRACP, Santosh Olakkengil DNB, FRACS, Patrick T. H. Coates PhD, FRACP, Shantanu Bhattacharjya MS, FRCS, FRACS
{"title":"Sterile versus clean urinary catheterisation is not associated with post-transplantation infection","authors":"Samantha Jolly MBBS, MS,&nbsp;Stefan Court-Kowalski MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;Victoria Lu MBBS, MT,&nbsp;Matthew Roberts MBBS, FRACP,&nbsp;Santosh Olakkengil DNB, FRACS,&nbsp;Patrick T. H. Coates PhD, FRACP,&nbsp;Shantanu Bhattacharjya MS, FRCS, FRACS","doi":"10.1111/ijun.12333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this study is to determine if there was a difference in rate of post-transplantation urinary tract infection (UTI) in patients who have an indwelling catheter inserted using sterile versus clean technique. UTI is the most common nosocomial infection in the post-transplantation period. We aim to describe risk factors associated with postoperative UTI in our institution and determine if there was a difference between those who have an indwelling catheter inserted using sterile versus clean technique. Risk factors for UTIs can be divided into recipient, donor, and procedure related factors. While an indwelling urinary catheter increases the risk of infection, it is vital for post-operative fluid balance monitoring. Given the morbidity of UTIs in transplant recipients, a number of studies have investigated modifiable risk factors; however, investigation of the technique of indwelling catheter insertion at the time of renal transplantation is yet to be examined. A retrospective analysis of a contemporaneously maintained database was performed of renal transplant recipients over a 2-year period from 2019–2021. Patients were divided into sterile versus clean technique, defined as the use of sterile gloves, gown and fenestrated drape following a surgical scrub, or sterile gloves alone following the use of alcohol-based hand sanitiser respectively. A <i>p</i> value of &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. One hundred sixty-nine patients were included in analysis, with 31 UTIs (18.3%) within 30 days of renal transplantation. Female gender and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease were associated with a higher rate of UTI. One hundred twenty-three patients had a catheter inserted via sterile technique, and 46 with clean technique, with no significant difference in rate of post-operative UTI (<i>p</i> = 0.52). Inserting an indwelling catheter either by sterile or clean technique at the time of renal transplantation was not associated with the rate of postoperative UTI within 30 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"17 1","pages":"56-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijun.12333","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine if there was a difference in rate of post-transplantation urinary tract infection (UTI) in patients who have an indwelling catheter inserted using sterile versus clean technique. UTI is the most common nosocomial infection in the post-transplantation period. We aim to describe risk factors associated with postoperative UTI in our institution and determine if there was a difference between those who have an indwelling catheter inserted using sterile versus clean technique. Risk factors for UTIs can be divided into recipient, donor, and procedure related factors. While an indwelling urinary catheter increases the risk of infection, it is vital for post-operative fluid balance monitoring. Given the morbidity of UTIs in transplant recipients, a number of studies have investigated modifiable risk factors; however, investigation of the technique of indwelling catheter insertion at the time of renal transplantation is yet to be examined. A retrospective analysis of a contemporaneously maintained database was performed of renal transplant recipients over a 2-year period from 2019–2021. Patients were divided into sterile versus clean technique, defined as the use of sterile gloves, gown and fenestrated drape following a surgical scrub, or sterile gloves alone following the use of alcohol-based hand sanitiser respectively. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. One hundred sixty-nine patients were included in analysis, with 31 UTIs (18.3%) within 30 days of renal transplantation. Female gender and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease were associated with a higher rate of UTI. One hundred twenty-three patients had a catheter inserted via sterile technique, and 46 with clean technique, with no significant difference in rate of post-operative UTI (p = 0.52). Inserting an indwelling catheter either by sterile or clean technique at the time of renal transplantation was not associated with the rate of postoperative UTI within 30 days.

无菌导尿管与清洁导尿管与移植后感染无关
本研究的目的是确定采用无菌和清洁技术留置导尿管的患者在移植后尿路感染(UTI)发生率方面是否存在差异。尿路感染是移植后最常见的医院感染。我们的目的是描述我们机构中与术后尿路感染相关的危险因素,并确定使用无菌技术和清洁技术插入留置导管的患者之间是否存在差异。尿路感染的危险因素可分为受体、供体和手术相关因素。虽然留置导尿管会增加感染的风险,但它对术后液体平衡监测至关重要。鉴于移植受者尿路感染的发病率,许多研究调查了可改变的危险因素;然而,关于肾移植时留置导尿管技术的研究尚待探讨。对2019-2021年2年期间肾移植受者的同期维护数据库进行回顾性分析。患者被分为无菌与清洁两组,定义为在手术擦洗后使用无菌手套、长袍和开窗窗帘,或在使用含酒精的洗手液后单独使用无菌手套。p值为<0.05认为有统计学意义。169例患者纳入分析,其中31例尿路感染(18.3%)发生在肾移植后30天内。女性和常染色体显性多囊肾病与尿路感染的高发率相关。无菌技术置管123例,清洁技术置管46例,术后尿路感染发生率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.52)。在肾移植时采用无菌或清洁技术留置导尿管与术后30天内尿路感染发生率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信