Co-producing trauma-informed youth justice in Australia?

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
A. Day, Catia G. Malvaso, Luke Butcher, J. O’Connor, Katherine McLachlan
{"title":"Co-producing trauma-informed youth justice in Australia?","authors":"A. Day, Catia G. Malvaso, Luke Butcher, J. O’Connor, Katherine McLachlan","doi":"10.1108/sc-08-2022-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Recent years have seen significant policy and practice interest in how to best respond to the impact of childhood maltreatment and adversity on young people’s contact with youth justice systems. In Australia, this has resulted in increasing pressure to implement trauma-informed practice, although this is a term that has different meanings for different stakeholders, and little is known about the perspectives of justice-involved young people. This paper aims to review what is currently known about co-production in youth justice and discuss ways in which young people can be meaningfully involved in the development of trauma-informed practice frameworks. Design/methodology/approach A narrative approach is used to present a contextual overview of youth justice in Australia, introduce key concepts underpinning trauma-informed practice and consider the barriers and facilitators of co-production and participatory approaches to the development and implementation of trauma-informed practice. Findings Youth justice in Australia is widely viewed as in urgent need of reform, with broad interest in developing more trauma-informed practice in these systems. Co-production and participatory approaches are fundamental to the reform process and can help to ensure that the views and aspirations of the children for whom these systems are responsible are embedded in efforts to implement trauma-informed practice. Research limitations/implications This paper presents an argument for implementing trauma-informed practice in Australian youth justice that is based on consultation and collaboration with young people. It does not present evidence about the potential effectiveness of such an approach. Practical implications This paper has direct implications for youth justice practice, in terms of both service philosophy, design and delivery. Social implications The work discussed in this paper offers possibilities for new and different ways of responding to youth crime and maintaining community safety. Originality/value Whilst the need to re-imagine youth justice is widely recognised, there are few resources available to support efforts to co-produce trauma-informed practice. This paper synthesises what is known about these approaches and offers some suggestions and possible ways forward.","PeriodicalId":43879,"journal":{"name":"Safer Communities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safer Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sc-08-2022-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Recent years have seen significant policy and practice interest in how to best respond to the impact of childhood maltreatment and adversity on young people’s contact with youth justice systems. In Australia, this has resulted in increasing pressure to implement trauma-informed practice, although this is a term that has different meanings for different stakeholders, and little is known about the perspectives of justice-involved young people. This paper aims to review what is currently known about co-production in youth justice and discuss ways in which young people can be meaningfully involved in the development of trauma-informed practice frameworks. Design/methodology/approach A narrative approach is used to present a contextual overview of youth justice in Australia, introduce key concepts underpinning trauma-informed practice and consider the barriers and facilitators of co-production and participatory approaches to the development and implementation of trauma-informed practice. Findings Youth justice in Australia is widely viewed as in urgent need of reform, with broad interest in developing more trauma-informed practice in these systems. Co-production and participatory approaches are fundamental to the reform process and can help to ensure that the views and aspirations of the children for whom these systems are responsible are embedded in efforts to implement trauma-informed practice. Research limitations/implications This paper presents an argument for implementing trauma-informed practice in Australian youth justice that is based on consultation and collaboration with young people. It does not present evidence about the potential effectiveness of such an approach. Practical implications This paper has direct implications for youth justice practice, in terms of both service philosophy, design and delivery. Social implications The work discussed in this paper offers possibilities for new and different ways of responding to youth crime and maintaining community safety. Originality/value Whilst the need to re-imagine youth justice is widely recognised, there are few resources available to support efforts to co-produce trauma-informed practice. This paper synthesises what is known about these approaches and offers some suggestions and possible ways forward.
在澳大利亚共同制作创伤知情青年司法?
近年来,人们对如何最好地应对童年虐待和逆境对青少年与青年司法系统接触的影响产生了重大的政策和实践兴趣。在澳大利亚,这导致实施创伤知情实践的压力越来越大,尽管这是一个对不同利益相关者有不同含义的术语,而且对涉及正义的年轻人的观点知之甚少。本文旨在回顾目前对青年司法合作的了解,并讨论年轻人可以有意义地参与创伤知情实践框架发展的方式。设计/方法/方法采用叙述的方法来介绍澳大利亚青年司法的背景概述,介绍支持创伤知情实践的关键概念,并考虑共同制作和参与方法的障碍和促进因素,以发展和实施创伤知情实践。人们普遍认为,澳大利亚的青少年司法制度急需改革,人们对在这些制度中发展更多的创伤知情实践有着广泛的兴趣。共同制作和参与性方法是改革进程的基础,有助于确保将这些系统负责的儿童的意见和愿望纳入实施创伤知情做法的努力中。研究局限/启示本文提出了在澳大利亚青年司法中实施创伤知情实践的论点,该实践基于与年轻人的协商和合作。它没有提供证据证明这种方法的潜在有效性。本研究对青少年司法实践有直接的启示,包括服务理念、设计和提供。社会意义本文讨论的工作为应对青少年犯罪和维护社区安全提供了新的和不同的方法。原创性/价值虽然重新构想青年司法的必要性已得到广泛认可,但支持共同开展创伤知情实践的资源却很少。本文综合了这些方法的已知情况,并提出了一些建议和可能的前进方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safer Communities
Safer Communities CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信