Conceptualizing, Organizing, and Positing Moderation in Communication Research

IF 5.4 3区材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL

ACS Applied Energy Materials Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.1093/CT/QTZ006

R. Holbert, Esul Park

引用次数: 87

Abstract

Meta-theoretical focus is given to how communication researchers are approaching and hypothesizing moderation. A moderation typology is offered and an evaluation of the field’s common practices for positing moderation reveals an inability to discern between three overarching classifications (Contributory, Contingent, Cleaved). A content analysis of eight communication journals reveals moderation hypotheses lacking a level of precision that can best aid the field’s knowledge generation. In addition, vague hypothesizing is leaving communication researchers vulnerable to the commitment of Type III error (i.e., correctly rejecting a null hypothesis for the wrong reason). Recommendations are provided in an effort to improve the field’s conceptualization and presentation of moderation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

传播学研究中的概念化、组织化和积极调节

元理论的重点是传播研究人员如何接近和假设适度。提供了一种适度类型，对该领域提出适度的常见做法的评估表明，无法区分三个总体分类（贡献型、偶然型和分裂型）。对八种传播期刊的内容分析表明，适度假设缺乏最有助于该领域知识生成的准确度。此外，模糊的假设使沟通研究人员容易受到III型错误的影响（即，以错误的理由正确拒绝无效假设）。提供建议是为了改进该领域对适度性的概念化和表述。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry

CiteScore

10.30

自引率

6.20%

发文量

1368

期刊介绍： ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.