Agreement and accuracy of fully automated morphometric femorotibial cartilage analysis in radiographic knee osteoarthritis

Felix Eckstein , Akshay S. Chaudhari , Jana Kemnitz , Christian F. Baumgartner , Wolfgang Wirth
{"title":"Agreement and accuracy of fully automated morphometric femorotibial cartilage analysis in radiographic knee osteoarthritis","authors":"Felix Eckstein ,&nbsp;Akshay S. Chaudhari ,&nbsp;Jana Kemnitz ,&nbsp;Christian F. Baumgartner ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Wirth","doi":"10.1016/j.ostima.2023.100156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the performance of automated convolutional neuronal network cartilage segmentation in knees with radiographic osteoarthritis (ROA), and its dependence on the OA status of the training set and MRI sequences.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>We studied 122 ROA and 92 healthy reference cohort (HRC) knees from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. All knees had expert manual segmentation of the femorotibial cartilages based on coronal FLASH and sagittal DESS MRI. Two U-net convolutional neural networks were trained on 86/50 ROA/HRC knees, validated on 18/21, and tested on 18/21.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 122 ROA knees, 43 (35%) were KLG2, 41 (34%) KLG3, and 38 (31%) KLG4. In the ROA test set, Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSCs) were 0.86/0.86 (FLASH/DESS) for the algorithm trained on ROA, and 0.82/0.82 for that trained on HRC knees. In the HRC test set, mean DSCs of 0.91/0.90 were observed with FLASH/DESS, both with the HRC- and with the ROA-trained algorithm. Cartilage thickness computation from automated segmentation in the FLASH ROA test set showed a correlation of <em>r</em> = 0.94 with manual segmentation for the ROA-trained, and of <em>r</em> = 0.89 for the HRC-trained algorithm. In the FLASH HRC test set, it exhibited a correlation of <em>r</em> = 0.96 for the HRC-trained and <em>r</em> = 0.88 for the ROA-trained algorithm. Results were similar between the DESS and FLASH, but were less accurate for KLG4 than for KLG2/3 knees.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>An automated algorithm trained on ROA knees was able to accurately segment and compute cartilage thickness on FLASH and DESS MRI, in both ROA and healthy knees, whereas an algorithm trained on healthy knees did not perform as well in ROA knees.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74378,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis imaging","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654123000739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine the performance of automated convolutional neuronal network cartilage segmentation in knees with radiographic osteoarthritis (ROA), and its dependence on the OA status of the training set and MRI sequences.

Design

We studied 122 ROA and 92 healthy reference cohort (HRC) knees from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. All knees had expert manual segmentation of the femorotibial cartilages based on coronal FLASH and sagittal DESS MRI. Two U-net convolutional neural networks were trained on 86/50 ROA/HRC knees, validated on 18/21, and tested on 18/21.

Results

Of 122 ROA knees, 43 (35%) were KLG2, 41 (34%) KLG3, and 38 (31%) KLG4. In the ROA test set, Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSCs) were 0.86/0.86 (FLASH/DESS) for the algorithm trained on ROA, and 0.82/0.82 for that trained on HRC knees. In the HRC test set, mean DSCs of 0.91/0.90 were observed with FLASH/DESS, both with the HRC- and with the ROA-trained algorithm. Cartilage thickness computation from automated segmentation in the FLASH ROA test set showed a correlation of r = 0.94 with manual segmentation for the ROA-trained, and of r = 0.89 for the HRC-trained algorithm. In the FLASH HRC test set, it exhibited a correlation of r = 0.96 for the HRC-trained and r = 0.88 for the ROA-trained algorithm. Results were similar between the DESS and FLASH, but were less accurate for KLG4 than for KLG2/3 knees.

Conclusions

An automated algorithm trained on ROA knees was able to accurately segment and compute cartilage thickness on FLASH and DESS MRI, in both ROA and healthy knees, whereas an algorithm trained on healthy knees did not perform as well in ROA knees.

膝关节骨性关节炎放射照相中全自动股胫软骨形态分析的一致性和准确性
目的探讨自动卷积神经网络软骨分割在膝关节影像学骨性关节炎(ROA)中的应用效果及其对训练集OA状态和MRI序列的依赖性。设计:我们研究了来自骨关节炎倡议的122例ROA膝关节和92例健康参考队列(HRC)膝关节。在冠状面FLASH和矢状面DESS MRI的基础上,对所有膝关节进行了专家手工分割股胫软骨。两个U-net卷积神经网络在86/50 ROA/HRC膝上训练,18/21验证,18/21测试。结果122例ROA膝关节中,KLG2 43例(35%),KLG3 41例(34%),KLG4 38例(31%)。在ROA测试集中,基于ROA训练的算法的Dice Similarity Coefficients (dsc)为0.86/0.86 (FLASH/DESS),基于HRC膝部训练的算法的Dice Similarity Coefficients为0.82/0.82。在HRC测试集中,FLASH/DESS在HRC-和roa训练算法下的平均dsc为0.91/0.90。在FLASH ROA测试集中,自动分割计算的软骨厚度与人工分割的相关性为r = 0.94,与人工分割的相关性为r = 0.89。在FLASH HRC测试集中,HRC训练算法的相关性为r = 0.96, roa训练算法的相关性为r = 0.88。DESS和FLASH的结果相似,但KLG4的准确性低于KLG2/3膝关节。结论在ROA膝关节上训练的自动算法在ROA膝关节和健康膝关节的FLASH和DESS MRI上都能准确地分割和计算软骨厚度,而在健康膝关节上训练的算法在ROA膝关节上表现不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis imaging
Osteoarthritis imaging Radiology and Imaging
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信