{"title":"The power of collective vision: landscape, visual media, and the production of American mountains","authors":"Danielle R. Raad","doi":"10.1080/08873631.2020.1775005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The way we view the landscape is socially constructed and influenced by media. Images from paintings to digital photographs influence how Americans see mountains and reproduce a collective vision. I describe the process by which this collective vision of nature and mountains in the United States has been constructed through the dissemination of visual media and the rise of domestic tourism. The progression of landscape representation modes over the past two centuries has continuously distanced the image from reality. Since the American collective vision of the mountain is a simulacrum, I use Jean Baudrillard's orders of simulation as a heuristic for understanding the diachronic relationship between the landscape and its visual representations. I argue that this collective vision possesses the powers to colonize, to nationalize, to exclude, and to constrain ways of seeing mountains. These powers inform one another to the present day and are all entangled with the collective vision of mountains. I trace the history of mountain representation in America and the process of American orogenesis to show how image production and distribution is linked to the orders of simulation and the power trajectory from colonization to nationalization to exclusion and ultimately to a myopic view of mountains.","PeriodicalId":45137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Geography","volume":"38 1","pages":"102 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08873631.2020.1775005","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2020.1775005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
ABSTRACT The way we view the landscape is socially constructed and influenced by media. Images from paintings to digital photographs influence how Americans see mountains and reproduce a collective vision. I describe the process by which this collective vision of nature and mountains in the United States has been constructed through the dissemination of visual media and the rise of domestic tourism. The progression of landscape representation modes over the past two centuries has continuously distanced the image from reality. Since the American collective vision of the mountain is a simulacrum, I use Jean Baudrillard's orders of simulation as a heuristic for understanding the diachronic relationship between the landscape and its visual representations. I argue that this collective vision possesses the powers to colonize, to nationalize, to exclude, and to constrain ways of seeing mountains. These powers inform one another to the present day and are all entangled with the collective vision of mountains. I trace the history of mountain representation in America and the process of American orogenesis to show how image production and distribution is linked to the orders of simulation and the power trajectory from colonization to nationalization to exclusion and ultimately to a myopic view of mountains.
期刊介绍:
Since 1979 this lively journal has provided an international forum for scholarly research devoted to the spatial aspects of human groups, their activities, associated landscapes, and other cultural phenomena. The journal features high quality articles that are written in an accessible style. With a suite of full-length research articles, interpretive essays, special thematic issues devoted to major topics of interest, and book reviews, the Journal of Cultural Geography remains an indispensable resource both within and beyond the academic community. The journal"s audience includes the well-read general public and specialists from geography, ethnic studies, history, historic preservation.