Are We Transforming Towards More Balanced Relationships? Production Connections Between China and Poland in the 21st Century

Q2 Social Sciences
Danube Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.2478/danb-2022-0010
E. Cieślik
{"title":"Are We Transforming Towards More Balanced Relationships? Production Connections Between China and Poland in the 21st Century","authors":"E. Cieślik","doi":"10.2478/danb-2022-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The trade relations between Poland and China have been highly unbalanced. Taking into account the fact that standard trade flows do not reflect the real position of the economy in production links, it was decided to analyse the value-added flows. The goal of the study is to identify the intensity of the value added flows between the Polish and Chinese industries. Two hypotheses were stated: 1) as a result of the introduction of the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013, the role of Chinese value added directed to Poland increased; 2) the role of Poland as a supplier of added value for Chinese production is gradually growing. The study utilizes the Inter-Country Input-Output Database in the output-input model. Results indicate that Poland has significantly worsened its position in global production links in relation to China in many industries and is still more dependent on value added coming from the EU than on the Chinese value added. The role of Polish value added in Chinese industries is low and has not increased since the BRI introduction. Moreover, it is difficult to conclude that the growing role of China in production links with Poland is the result of the BRI introduction, because no significant changes were observed after starting this strategy.","PeriodicalId":38400,"journal":{"name":"Danube","volume":"13 1","pages":"155 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danube","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2022-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The trade relations between Poland and China have been highly unbalanced. Taking into account the fact that standard trade flows do not reflect the real position of the economy in production links, it was decided to analyse the value-added flows. The goal of the study is to identify the intensity of the value added flows between the Polish and Chinese industries. Two hypotheses were stated: 1) as a result of the introduction of the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013, the role of Chinese value added directed to Poland increased; 2) the role of Poland as a supplier of added value for Chinese production is gradually growing. The study utilizes the Inter-Country Input-Output Database in the output-input model. Results indicate that Poland has significantly worsened its position in global production links in relation to China in many industries and is still more dependent on value added coming from the EU than on the Chinese value added. The role of Polish value added in Chinese industries is low and has not increased since the BRI introduction. Moreover, it is difficult to conclude that the growing role of China in production links with Poland is the result of the BRI introduction, because no significant changes were observed after starting this strategy.
我们正在向更平衡的关系转变吗?21世纪中国与波兰的生产联系
摘要波兰和中国之间的贸易关系一直高度不平衡。考虑到标准贸易流量不能反映经济在生产环节的实际地位,决定分析增值流量。这项研究的目的是确定波兰和中国工业之间增加值流动的强度。提出了两个假设:1)由于2013年“一带一路”倡议倡议的引入,中国对波兰的附加值作用增加;2) 波兰作为中国生产附加值供应商的作用正在逐渐增强。本研究在产出-投入模型中使用了国家间投入-产出数据库。结果表明,与中国相比,波兰在许多行业的全球生产环节中的地位显著恶化,并且仍然更依赖来自欧盟的附加值,而不是中国的附加值。波兰增加值在中国工业中的作用很低,自“一带一路”倡议实施以来一直没有增加。此外,很难断定中国在与波兰的生产联系中发挥的日益重要的作用是“一带一路”倡议的结果,因为在启动这一战略后没有观察到任何重大变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danube
Danube Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信