Manipulations in Contemporary German Press

Q2 Social Sciences
A. Levitskaya, A. Fedorov
{"title":"Manipulations in Contemporary German Press","authors":"A. Levitskaya, A. Fedorov","doi":"10.13187/ijmil.2021.2.364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the basis of the previously developed theoretical model of media educational activity, which contributes to the development of media competence of the audience in the process of analyzing the reliability of media texts, the authors of the article suggest the following technology of countering media manipulations and false information, based on tasks related to answering the following challenging questions: What is the source of information? Can you verify the source? What is the main message? What facts are presented to support the main idea? Is there any information missing? What is the purpose of transmitting this message? Who will benefit if people accept this message as true? Who will lose? From whose point of view is the message presented? Does the message refer to logic or emotion? What effect is it aimed at? Does this media text allow you to share different points of view? What values and priorities are transmitted as a result? Based on this model and problematic issues, the authors analyzed 337 articles in German newspapers during the period 2020-2021. Meanwhile, it was found that 98.2 % of the texts (331 out of 337 articles) expressed negative opinions about Russia, about its politics and economy.","PeriodicalId":36580,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Media and Information Literacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Media and Information Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2021.2.364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On the basis of the previously developed theoretical model of media educational activity, which contributes to the development of media competence of the audience in the process of analyzing the reliability of media texts, the authors of the article suggest the following technology of countering media manipulations and false information, based on tasks related to answering the following challenging questions: What is the source of information? Can you verify the source? What is the main message? What facts are presented to support the main idea? Is there any information missing? What is the purpose of transmitting this message? Who will benefit if people accept this message as true? Who will lose? From whose point of view is the message presented? Does the message refer to logic or emotion? What effect is it aimed at? Does this media text allow you to share different points of view? What values and priorities are transmitted as a result? Based on this model and problematic issues, the authors analyzed 337 articles in German newspapers during the period 2020-2021. Meanwhile, it was found that 98.2 % of the texts (331 out of 337 articles) expressed negative opinions about Russia, about its politics and economy.
当代德国新闻界的操纵
在分析媒体文本可靠性的过程中,媒介教育活动有助于受众媒介能力的发展,在此理论模型的基础上,本文的作者提出了以下应对媒体操纵和虚假信息的技术,其任务是回答以下具有挑战性的问题:信息的来源是什么?你能证实消息来源吗?主要信息是什么?提出了哪些事实来支持主要观点?有没有遗漏什么信息?传递这条信息的目的是什么?如果人们认为这是真的,谁将从中受益?谁会输?这个信息是从谁的角度提出的?这个信息指的是逻辑还是情感?它的目的是什么?这个媒体文本允许你分享不同的观点吗?结果传递了什么样的价值观和优先级?基于这一模型和存在的问题,作者分析了2020-2021年期间德国报纸上的337篇文章。另外,在337篇文章中,有331篇(98.2%)对俄罗斯的政治、经济持否定态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信