Work and Sexuality in the Sunbelt: Homophobic Workplace Discrimination in the U.S. South and Southwest, 1970 to the Present

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q4 BUSINESS
Joshua Hollands
{"title":"Work and Sexuality in the Sunbelt: Homophobic Workplace Discrimination in the U.S. South and Southwest, 1970 to the Present","authors":"Joshua Hollands","doi":"10.1017/eso.2021.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2016, PayPal, amultinational financial services company canceled an expansion intoNorth Carolina worth millions of dollars and with hundreds of jobs. The cancellation was in response to the state legislature’s passage of a transphobic law. The Public and Facilities Privacy and Security Act restricted transgender and nonbinary individuals from using public restrooms consistent with their gender identity. The act also overturned broader local nondiscrimination ordinances.1 PayPal’s corporate activism in support of the rights of sexual minorities and gender nonconformists reflected a half-century of activism by lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) activists who demanded workplace rights and benefits through their employer when cities and states refused to provide nondiscrimination protections. The majority of LGBT people had no federal protection against discrimination in employment until the U.S. Supreme Court ruled sexual orientation and gender identity are protected characteristics under Title VII of the Civil RightsAct (1964) in June 2020.2 Even after the achievement of same-sex marriage in 2015, few southern states provided workplace protections for sexual minorities. Workers across the South and Southwest could therefore be married to someone of the same sex but be fired by their homophobic boss for being gay.3 “Work and Sexuality in the Sunbelt” examines how sexual minorities reshaped the corporate workplace to provide protections in areas where federal, state, and local governments fell short. Pressure in this arena was successful to the extent that most major companies now prohibit discrimination and openly campaign for equality. Several case studies of homophobic discrimination are examined. Chapters on individual companies includingApple, Cracker Barrel, Duke University, and ExxonMobil shed light on mainstream LGBT strategies for equality within corporations as well as the extent to which victories at these companies","PeriodicalId":45977,"journal":{"name":"Enterprise & Society","volume":"22 1","pages":"939 - 949"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enterprise & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2021.50","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2016, PayPal, amultinational financial services company canceled an expansion intoNorth Carolina worth millions of dollars and with hundreds of jobs. The cancellation was in response to the state legislature’s passage of a transphobic law. The Public and Facilities Privacy and Security Act restricted transgender and nonbinary individuals from using public restrooms consistent with their gender identity. The act also overturned broader local nondiscrimination ordinances.1 PayPal’s corporate activism in support of the rights of sexual minorities and gender nonconformists reflected a half-century of activism by lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) activists who demanded workplace rights and benefits through their employer when cities and states refused to provide nondiscrimination protections. The majority of LGBT people had no federal protection against discrimination in employment until the U.S. Supreme Court ruled sexual orientation and gender identity are protected characteristics under Title VII of the Civil RightsAct (1964) in June 2020.2 Even after the achievement of same-sex marriage in 2015, few southern states provided workplace protections for sexual minorities. Workers across the South and Southwest could therefore be married to someone of the same sex but be fired by their homophobic boss for being gay.3 “Work and Sexuality in the Sunbelt” examines how sexual minorities reshaped the corporate workplace to provide protections in areas where federal, state, and local governments fell short. Pressure in this arena was successful to the extent that most major companies now prohibit discrimination and openly campaign for equality. Several case studies of homophobic discrimination are examined. Chapters on individual companies includingApple, Cracker Barrel, Duke University, and ExxonMobil shed light on mainstream LGBT strategies for equality within corporations as well as the extent to which victories at these companies
阳光地带的工作与性:1970年至今美国南部和西南部恐同工作场所歧视
2016年,跨国金融服务公司贝宝(PayPal)取消了在北卡罗来纳州的扩张计划,该计划价值数百万美元,涉及数百个工作岗位。取消婚礼是对该州立法机构通过一项反变性法律的回应。《公共设施隐私与安全法》限制跨性别者和非二元性别者使用符合其性别认同的公共厕所。该法案还推翻了更广泛的地方非歧视条例贝宝支持性少数群体和性别不墨于常规者权利的企业行动,反映了半个世纪以来女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人(LGBT)活动人士的行动,当城市和州拒绝提供不歧视保护时,他们通过雇主要求工作场所的权利和福利。在美国最高法院于2020年6月裁定性取向和性别认同是受《民权法案》(1964年)第七章保护的特征之前,大多数LGBT人群在就业方面没有受到联邦保护。2即使在2015年同性婚姻合法化之后,南方各州也很少为性少数群体提供工作场所保护。因此,美国南部和西南部的工人可能会与同性结婚,但却会因为是同性恋而被厌恶同性恋的老板解雇《阳光地带的工作与性》研究了性少数群体如何重塑公司工作场所,在联邦、州和地方政府缺乏的领域提供保护。在这个舞台上施加的压力是成功的,大多数大公司现在都禁止歧视,并公开争取平等。对同性恋歧视的几个案例研究进行了审查。书中有关苹果、Cracker Barrel、杜克大学(Duke University)和埃克森美孚(ExxonMobil)等公司的章节,揭示了LGBT在企业内部争取平等的主流策略,以及这些公司取得胜利的程度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Enterprise & Society offers a forum for research on the historical relations between businesses and their larger political, cultural, institutional, social, and economic contexts. The journal aims to be truly international in scope. Studies focused on individual firms and industries and grounded in a broad historical framework are welcome, as are innovative applications of economic or management theories to business and its context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信