Improving Voluntary, Rights-Based Family Planning: Experience From Nigeria And Uganda

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
K. Hardee, Kaja Jurczynska, I. Sinai, Victoria Boydell, Diana Kabahuma Muhwezi, K. Gray, K. Wright
{"title":"Improving Voluntary, Rights-Based Family Planning: Experience From Nigeria And Uganda","authors":"K. Hardee, Kaja Jurczynska, I. Sinai, Victoria Boydell, Diana Kabahuma Muhwezi, K. Gray, K. Wright","doi":"10.2147/OAJC.S215945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Growing focus on the need for voluntary, rights-based family planning (VRBFP) has drawn attention to the lack of programs that adhere to the range of rights principles. This paper describes two first-of-their-kind interventions in Kaduna State, Nigeria and in Uganda in 2016–2017, accompanied by implementation research based on a conceptual framework that translates internationally agreed rights into family planning programming. Methods This paper describes the interventions, and profiles lessons learned about VRBFP implementation from both countries, as well as measured outcomes of VRBFP programming from Nigeria. Results The intervention components in both projects were similar. Both programs built provider and supervisor capacity in VRBFP using comparable curricula; developed facility-level action plans and supported action plan implementation; aimed to increase clients’ rights literacy at the facility using posters and handouts; and established or strengthened health committee structures to support VRBFP. Through the interventions, rights literacy increased, and providers were able to see the benefits of taking a VRBFP approach to serving clients. The importance of ensuring a client focus and supporting clients to make their own family planning choices was reinforced. Providers recognized the importance of treating all clients, regardless of age or marital status, for example, with dignity. Privacy and confidentiality were enhanced. Recognition of what violations of rights are and the need to report and address them through strong accountability systems grew. Many lessons were shared across the two countries, including the need for rights literacy; attention to health systems issues; strong and supportive supervision; and the importance of working at multiple levels. Additionally, some unique lessons emanated from each country experience. Conclusion The assessed feasibility and benefits of using VRBFP programming and outcome measures in both countries bode well for adoption of this approach in other geographies.","PeriodicalId":74348,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJC.S215945","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S215945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background Growing focus on the need for voluntary, rights-based family planning (VRBFP) has drawn attention to the lack of programs that adhere to the range of rights principles. This paper describes two first-of-their-kind interventions in Kaduna State, Nigeria and in Uganda in 2016–2017, accompanied by implementation research based on a conceptual framework that translates internationally agreed rights into family planning programming. Methods This paper describes the interventions, and profiles lessons learned about VRBFP implementation from both countries, as well as measured outcomes of VRBFP programming from Nigeria. Results The intervention components in both projects were similar. Both programs built provider and supervisor capacity in VRBFP using comparable curricula; developed facility-level action plans and supported action plan implementation; aimed to increase clients’ rights literacy at the facility using posters and handouts; and established or strengthened health committee structures to support VRBFP. Through the interventions, rights literacy increased, and providers were able to see the benefits of taking a VRBFP approach to serving clients. The importance of ensuring a client focus and supporting clients to make their own family planning choices was reinforced. Providers recognized the importance of treating all clients, regardless of age or marital status, for example, with dignity. Privacy and confidentiality were enhanced. Recognition of what violations of rights are and the need to report and address them through strong accountability systems grew. Many lessons were shared across the two countries, including the need for rights literacy; attention to health systems issues; strong and supportive supervision; and the importance of working at multiple levels. Additionally, some unique lessons emanated from each country experience. Conclusion The assessed feasibility and benefits of using VRBFP programming and outcome measures in both countries bode well for adoption of this approach in other geographies.
改进基于权利的自愿计划生育:尼日利亚和乌干达的经验
背景人们越来越关注基于权利的自愿计划生育(VRBFP)的必要性,这引起了人们对缺乏遵守一系列权利原则的计划的关注。本文描述了2016年至2017年在尼日利亚卡杜纳州和乌干达进行的两项首次此类干预措施,以及基于概念框架的实施研究,该框架将国际商定的权利转化为计划生育方案。方法本文描述了干预措施,介绍了两国在VRBFP实施方面的经验教训,以及尼日利亚VRBFP规划的衡量结果。结果两个项目的干预成分相似。这两个项目都使用类似的课程建立了VRBFP的提供者和监督员能力;制定设施层面的行动计划,并支持行动计划的实施;旨在通过海报和讲义提高客户在该设施的权利知识;建立或加强卫生委员会结构,以支持VRBFP。通过干预措施,权利普及率提高,提供者能够看到采取VRBFP方法为客户服务的好处。确保以客户为中心并支持客户做出自己的计划生育选择的重要性得到了加强。提供者认识到有尊严地对待所有客户的重要性,例如,无论年龄或婚姻状况如何。隐私和保密性得到加强。人们越来越认识到什么是侵犯权利的行为,以及通过强有力的问责制度报告和解决这些问题的必要性。两国分享了许多经验教训,包括需要普及权利;关注卫生系统问题;强有力的支持性监督;以及多层次工作的重要性。此外,每个国家的经验都有一些独特的教训。结论经评估,在两国使用VRBFP方案和成果衡量标准的可行性和效益预示着在其他地区采用这种方法是好兆头。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信