Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Monotherapy with Carbamazepine and Phenytoin In Epilepsy : A Meta-Analysis

Aashka Shah, D. Rana, S. Malhotra
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Monotherapy with Carbamazepine and Phenytoin In Epilepsy : A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Aashka Shah, D. Rana, S. Malhotra","doi":"10.32892/jmri.154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims and Objectives \n \nTo review and analyse statistically the evidence from existing randomised controlled trials. \nTo compare the efficacy and safety of carbamazepine and phenytoin when used as monotherapy treatments. \nTo assess the effectiveness of the drug at controlling seizures and to evaluate tolerability with regard to side effects of these drugs. \n \nMethodology: A systemic review with the comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of monotherapy with Carbamazepine and Phenytoin in epilepsy was carried out. Seven studies with Randomised Controlled Trials of carbamazepine and phenytoin as monotherapy were taken up for Meta Analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Time to withdrawal of allocated treatment (retention time) was chosen as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included Time to achieve 12-month remission (seizure-free period), Time to achieve six-month remission (seizure-free period), Time to first seizure post-randomisation, Adverse events (including adverse events relating to treatment withdrawal. The data was entered in the MedCalc Statistical Software version 17.5.5 and analysed. The principal summary measure were the Odd’s Ratio And Hazard Ratio (HR) (at 95% Confidence Interval). Funnel Plot and Forest Plot were plotted. \nResults: The overall pooled odd‘s ratio for the primary outcome (for 862 participants) was 0.882(fixed effect model) and 0.877(random effect model) (95% confidence interval (CI)0.63 to 1.22, P = 0.3643). The P value was 0.3643 which proved the statistically insignificant difference in the efficacy of the two drugs(0.05 is considered as significant p value). As for the adverse effects ; rash, dysmorphic and idiosyncratic side effects include gum hypertrophy , hirsutism , acne etc. are more frequently associated with phenytoin. Drowsiness, Tiredness, Fatigue and sedation are more associated with carbamazepine as compared to phenytoin. The overall pooled odd’s ratio for “Time to achieve 6 month remission” (for 232 participants) was 1.232(fixed) and 1.272(random) (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.732 to 2.073(fixed), P = 0.0910), indicating an advantage for phenytoin for the 6 month remission outcome. \nConclusion: The study concluded that there was no statistically significant difference achieved between the two treatment arms. Hence the neurophysician is compelled to rely on the individual patient characteristics for dispensing the drug. Hence the study provides a robust evidence that the two treatments are equally efficacious.","PeriodicalId":73819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical research and innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical research and innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32892/jmri.154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and Objectives To review and analyse statistically the evidence from existing randomised controlled trials. To compare the efficacy and safety of carbamazepine and phenytoin when used as monotherapy treatments. To assess the effectiveness of the drug at controlling seizures and to evaluate tolerability with regard to side effects of these drugs. Methodology: A systemic review with the comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of monotherapy with Carbamazepine and Phenytoin in epilepsy was carried out. Seven studies with Randomised Controlled Trials of carbamazepine and phenytoin as monotherapy were taken up for Meta Analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Time to withdrawal of allocated treatment (retention time) was chosen as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included Time to achieve 12-month remission (seizure-free period), Time to achieve six-month remission (seizure-free period), Time to first seizure post-randomisation, Adverse events (including adverse events relating to treatment withdrawal. The data was entered in the MedCalc Statistical Software version 17.5.5 and analysed. The principal summary measure were the Odd’s Ratio And Hazard Ratio (HR) (at 95% Confidence Interval). Funnel Plot and Forest Plot were plotted. Results: The overall pooled odd‘s ratio for the primary outcome (for 862 participants) was 0.882(fixed effect model) and 0.877(random effect model) (95% confidence interval (CI)0.63 to 1.22, P = 0.3643). The P value was 0.3643 which proved the statistically insignificant difference in the efficacy of the two drugs(0.05 is considered as significant p value). As for the adverse effects ; rash, dysmorphic and idiosyncratic side effects include gum hypertrophy , hirsutism , acne etc. are more frequently associated with phenytoin. Drowsiness, Tiredness, Fatigue and sedation are more associated with carbamazepine as compared to phenytoin. The overall pooled odd’s ratio for “Time to achieve 6 month remission” (for 232 participants) was 1.232(fixed) and 1.272(random) (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.732 to 2.073(fixed), P = 0.0910), indicating an advantage for phenytoin for the 6 month remission outcome. Conclusion: The study concluded that there was no statistically significant difference achieved between the two treatment arms. Hence the neurophysician is compelled to rely on the individual patient characteristics for dispensing the drug. Hence the study provides a robust evidence that the two treatments are equally efficacious.
卡马西平与苯妥英单药治疗癫痫的疗效和安全性比较:一项荟萃分析
目的和目的回顾和分析来自现有随机对照试验的统计证据。比较卡马西平和苯妥英单药治疗的疗效和安全性。评估药物控制癫痫发作的有效性,并评估这些药物的副作用的耐受性。方法:对卡马西平与苯妥英单药治疗癫痫的疗效和安全性进行系统评价。根据纳入和排除标准,采用卡马西平和苯妥英作为单药治疗的7项随机对照试验进行Meta分析。选择退出分配治疗的时间(保留时间)作为主要观察指标。次要结局包括12个月缓解时间(无发作期)、6个月缓解时间(无发作期)、随机化后首次发作时间、不良事件(包括与停药相关的不良事件)。将数据输入MedCalc统计软件17.5.5版并进行分析。主要的综合测量是奇数比和风险比(HR)(95%置信区间)。绘制漏斗图和森林图。结果:主要结局(862名参与者)的总合并奇数比为0.882(固定效应模型)和0.877(随机效应模型)(95%置信区间(CI)0.63至1.22,P = 0.3643)。P值为0.3643,说明两种药物的疗效差异无统计学意义(P值为0.05)。至于不良影响;皮疹,畸形和特殊的副作用包括牙龈肥大,多毛,痤疮等更常与苯妥英有关。与苯妥英相比,卡马西平更容易引起嗜睡、疲劳、疲劳和镇静。“达到6个月缓解的时间”(232名参与者)的总汇总奇比为1.232(固定)和1.272(随机)(95%置信区间(CI) 0.732至2.073(固定),P = 0.0910),表明苯托英在6个月缓解结果中具有优势。结论:本研究得出两个治疗组间无统计学显著差异。因此,神经内科医生不得不依靠病人的个体特征来分配药物。因此,该研究提供了强有力的证据,证明这两种治疗方法同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信