W. Abdulghaffara, M. Nasr, W. Shahin, Elder Am, Akl Th
{"title":"3-T Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) forCharacterization of Hepatic Masses","authors":"W. Abdulghaffara, M. Nasr, W. Shahin, Elder Am, Akl Th","doi":"10.4172/2167-7964.1000249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the role of DWI and ADC in differentiating benign from malignant hepaticmasses \nMaterials and methods: Forty-one patients with fifty-two focal hepatic masses were included in our study. MRI \n was done using coronal T2-weighted single-shot turbo spin-echo, breath hold axial 3-D gradient-echo, breath hold 2- \n D gradient-echo in and out-of-phase, respiratory-triggered axial turbo spin-echo T2 sequence with fat saturation, \n followed by free breathing Diffusion-weighted MR imaging using a single-shot spin-echo echo planar imaging \n sequence and finally triphasic -MRI. \nResults: Forty-one patients (Fifty-two lesions) were included in our study. Twenty-three lesions were benign; \n eight of them were cysts (mean ADC values of 3.15 ± 0.34 × 10-3 mm2/s) and fifteen lesions were hemangiomas \n (mean ADC values of 2.10 ± 0.25 × 10-3 mm2/s). Twenty-nine lesions were malignant; twelve HCC lesions (mean \n ADC values of 1.10 ± 0.32 × 10-3 mm2/s) and seventeen masses were metastasis (mean ADC values of 0.96 ± 0.23 \n × 10-3 mm2/s). Sensitivity and specificity of DWI in differentiating malignant from benign hepatic masses were 96.6% \n and 95.7% respectively. \nConclusion: DWI is an easy technique to obtain and to be evaluated. ADC values can differentiate benign from \n malignant liver masses with high sensitivity and specificity.","PeriodicalId":90030,"journal":{"name":"OMICS journal of radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2167-7964.1000249","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OMICS journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-7964.1000249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the role of DWI and ADC in differentiating benign from malignant hepaticmasses
Materials and methods: Forty-one patients with fifty-two focal hepatic masses were included in our study. MRI
was done using coronal T2-weighted single-shot turbo spin-echo, breath hold axial 3-D gradient-echo, breath hold 2-
D gradient-echo in and out-of-phase, respiratory-triggered axial turbo spin-echo T2 sequence with fat saturation,
followed by free breathing Diffusion-weighted MR imaging using a single-shot spin-echo echo planar imaging
sequence and finally triphasic -MRI.
Results: Forty-one patients (Fifty-two lesions) were included in our study. Twenty-three lesions were benign;
eight of them were cysts (mean ADC values of 3.15 ± 0.34 × 10-3 mm2/s) and fifteen lesions were hemangiomas
(mean ADC values of 2.10 ± 0.25 × 10-3 mm2/s). Twenty-nine lesions were malignant; twelve HCC lesions (mean
ADC values of 1.10 ± 0.32 × 10-3 mm2/s) and seventeen masses were metastasis (mean ADC values of 0.96 ± 0.23
× 10-3 mm2/s). Sensitivity and specificity of DWI in differentiating malignant from benign hepatic masses were 96.6%
and 95.7% respectively.
Conclusion: DWI is an easy technique to obtain and to be evaluated. ADC values can differentiate benign from
malignant liver masses with high sensitivity and specificity.