Effect of acquisitions on target firms' stakeholder welfare: Evidence from corporate social responsibility

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS
Gunae Choi, Tae-Nyun Kim
{"title":"Effect of acquisitions on target firms' stakeholder welfare: Evidence from corporate social responsibility","authors":"Gunae Choi,&nbsp;Tae-Nyun Kim","doi":"10.1111/basr.12279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines whether acquirers support targets' superior corporate social responsibility (CSR) and/or remedy targets' greater CSR problems during the post-merger integration process using multinomial logit and panel regression models. Furthermore, the study examines the subsequent impact of the acquirers' decision regarding target stakeholder welfare on acquisition performance based on the post-announcement performance of stock returns. Consequently, we find that acquirers generally do not adopt the superior CSR performance of target firms but instead support their better environmental and product CSR. However, the acquirers do not remedy any of the target's greater CSR problems. This study also reveals that the acquirers supporting targets' superior overall CSR have higher post-announcement stock returns than others. Meanwhile, post-announcement stock returns are lower when acquirers fail to fix the targets' greater CSR problems. As this study extends findings from recent scholarship reporting a positive association between CSR and acquisition performance, it sheds light on the importance of stakeholders' welfare in mergers and acquisitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46747,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","volume":"127 2","pages":"493-529"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/basr.12279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study examines whether acquirers support targets' superior corporate social responsibility (CSR) and/or remedy targets' greater CSR problems during the post-merger integration process using multinomial logit and panel regression models. Furthermore, the study examines the subsequent impact of the acquirers' decision regarding target stakeholder welfare on acquisition performance based on the post-announcement performance of stock returns. Consequently, we find that acquirers generally do not adopt the superior CSR performance of target firms but instead support their better environmental and product CSR. However, the acquirers do not remedy any of the target's greater CSR problems. This study also reveals that the acquirers supporting targets' superior overall CSR have higher post-announcement stock returns than others. Meanwhile, post-announcement stock returns are lower when acquirers fail to fix the targets' greater CSR problems. As this study extends findings from recent scholarship reporting a positive association between CSR and acquisition performance, it sheds light on the importance of stakeholders' welfare in mergers and acquisitions.

并购对目标公司利益相关者福利的影响:来自企业社会责任的证据
本研究运用多项logit和面板回归模型,考察并购方在并购后整合过程中,是否支持目标企业的卓越企业社会责任(CSR)和/或补救目标企业更大的企业社会责任问题。此外,本研究基于公告后的股票收益表现,检验了收购方关于目标利益相关者福利的决策对收购绩效的后续影响。因此,我们发现收购方一般不会采用目标公司的卓越CSR绩效,而是支持目标公司更好的环境和产品CSR。然而,收购方并没有解决任何被收购方更大的企业社会责任问题。本研究还发现,支持目标公司整体社会责任优越的收购方,其公告后股票收益高于其他收购方。与此同时,当收购方未能解决被收购方更大的企业社会责任问题时,公布后的股票回报率会较低。由于本研究扩展了最近学者报告的企业社会责任与收购绩效之间正相关的发现,它揭示了利益相关者福利在并购中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Business and Society Review addresses a wide range of ethical issues concerning the relationships between business, society, and the public good. Its contents are of vital concern to business people, academics, and others involved in the contemporary debate about the proper role of business in society. The journal publishes papers from all those working in this important area, including researchers and business professionals, members of the legal profession, government administrators and many others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信