The wicked angels of 1 En. 69:4–15: Part 1: New evidence and proposals for the names; Part 2: The nature and purpose of the list

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION

Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1177/09518207211032888

D. Olson

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This two-part article presents new evidence and proposals for the original names of the wicked angels listed in 1 En. 69:4–15 and an interpretation of the passage in light of the new proposals. Nine names (plus one additional term) are involved. Contrary to the assertions of most scholars, the names have been remarkably well preserved in the Ethiopic text, and the purpose of the whole is best explained in light of the anti-Babylonian polemic proposed by Henryk Drawnel as the driving force behind the similar angel listings in 1 En. 7–8.

查看原文本刊更多论文

恩人的邪恶天使。69:4-15：第1部分：新的证据和名称建议；第2部分：清单的性质和目的

这篇由两部分组成的文章为En上69:4-15中列出的邪恶天使的原始名字提供了新的证据和建议，并根据这些新建议对这段话进行了解释。涉及9个名称(加上一个额外的术语)。与大多数学者的断言相反，这些名字在埃塞俄比亚文本中保存得非常好，而且整个的目的最好解释为Henryk Drawnel提出的反巴比伦论战，作为在1 En. 7-8中类似天使列表背后的驱动力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The last twenty years have witnessed some remarkable achievements in the study of early Jewish literature. Given the ever-increasing number and availability of primary sources for these writings, specialists have been producing text-critical, historical, social scientific, and theological studies which, in turn, have fuelled a growing interest among scholars, students, religious leaders, and the wider public. The only English journal of its kind, Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha was founded in 1987 to provide a much-needed forum for scholars to discuss and review most recent developments in this burgeoning field in the academy.