Conflicting Appearances, Suspension of Judgment, and Pyrrhonian Skepticism without Commitment

IF 0.7 1区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1353/hph.2022.0052

Tamer Nawar

引用次数: 1

Abstract

abstract:By means of the Ten Modes, Pyrrhonian skeptics appeal to conflicting appearances to bring about suspension of judgment. However, precisely how the skeptic might do so in a nondogmatic manner is not entirely clear. In this paper, I argue that existing accounts of the Modes face significant objections, and I defend an alternative account that better explains the logical structure, rational nature, and effectiveness of the Modes. In particular, I clarify how the Modes appeal to concerns about epistemic impartiality and circularity, the nature of the skeptic's nondoxastic attitude(s), and how the skeptic can employ the Modes nondogmatically.

查看原文本刊更多论文

矛盾的表象、审判的中止和没有承诺的皮尔逊怀疑主义

皮罗派怀疑论者借助于十模论，诉诸矛盾的表象，使判断暂停。然而，怀疑论者究竟如何以一种非教条的方式做到这一点，还不完全清楚。在本文中，我认为现有的模态解释面临着重大的反对，我为一个更好地解释模态的逻辑结构、理性本质和有效性的替代解释辩护。特别是，我澄清了这些模式是如何引起人们对认知公正性和循环性的关注的，怀疑论者非对立态度的本质，以及怀疑论者如何非教条地使用这些模式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since January 2002, the Journal of the History of Philosophy has been published by The Johns Hopkins University Press. For subscriptions, change of address, and back issues, please contact Subscription Services. In addition to photocopying allowed by the "fair use" doctrine, JHP authorizes personal or educational multiple-copying by instructors for use within a course. This policy does not cover photocopying for commercial use either by individuals or publishers. All such uses must be authorized by JHP.