Effects of Measures of Emotional Intelligence on the Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ljerka Hajncl, Dario Vučenović
{"title":"Effects of Measures of Emotional Intelligence on the Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership","authors":"Ljerka Hajncl, Dario Vučenović","doi":"10.31820/pt.29.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The major purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationships between two measures of emotional intelligence: performance-based ability test, self-reported measure of ability emotional intelligence, and transformational leadership. Base on a sample of 177 middle-level and low-level leaders, in 16 organizations, the study tries to explain the role of emotional intelligence in the variance of transformational leadership style, after controlling for cognitive ability and five factors of personality. Vocabulary Emotion Test (VET-3), representing performance-based ability test of emotional intelligence, and Emotional Skills and Competence Questionnaire (ESCQ-45), representing self-report measure of emotional intelligence, TN-10 test of fluid intelligence and BFI - inventory of personality traits were administered to all supervisors in identifying their emotional intelligence, cognitive ability and personality traits. To evaluate the transformational leadership style, the short version of a Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ X5) was used for 177 selfratings. The results show that VET-3 as the measure of ability EI has no relationship with transformational style. The results obtained in hierarchical regression analysis of self-ratings transformational leadership show that the personality traits were significant predictors but that selfreport measure of EI incrementally explained 5% of the variance of transformational leadership.","PeriodicalId":20858,"journal":{"name":"Psihologijske teme","volume":"29 1","pages":"119-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31820/pt.29.1.7","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihologijske teme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.29.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The major purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationships between two measures of emotional intelligence: performance-based ability test, self-reported measure of ability emotional intelligence, and transformational leadership. Base on a sample of 177 middle-level and low-level leaders, in 16 organizations, the study tries to explain the role of emotional intelligence in the variance of transformational leadership style, after controlling for cognitive ability and five factors of personality. Vocabulary Emotion Test (VET-3), representing performance-based ability test of emotional intelligence, and Emotional Skills and Competence Questionnaire (ESCQ-45), representing self-report measure of emotional intelligence, TN-10 test of fluid intelligence and BFI - inventory of personality traits were administered to all supervisors in identifying their emotional intelligence, cognitive ability and personality traits. To evaluate the transformational leadership style, the short version of a Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ X5) was used for 177 selfratings. The results show that VET-3 as the measure of ability EI has no relationship with transformational style. The results obtained in hierarchical regression analysis of self-ratings transformational leadership show that the personality traits were significant predictors but that selfreport measure of EI incrementally explained 5% of the variance of transformational leadership.
情绪智力测量对情绪智力与变革型领导关系的影响
本研究的主要目的是调查两种情绪智力指标之间的关系:基于绩效的能力测试、自我报告的能力情绪智力指标和变革型领导。本研究以16个组织的177名中低级领导为样本,在控制了认知能力和人格五个因素后,试图解释情商在变革型领导风格变化中的作用。词汇情绪测试(VET-3),代表基于绩效的情绪智力能力测试,情绪技能和能力问卷(ESCQ-45),代表情绪智力的自我报告测量,TN-10流体智力测试和BFI-人格特征清单,对所有主管进行情绪智力识别,认知能力和人格特征。为了评估变革型领导风格,使用多因素领导问卷(MLQ X5)的简短版本进行177次自我评分。结果表明,VET-3作为衡量能力EI的指标与转换风格无关。自我评价变革型领导的层次回归分析结果表明,人格特征是显著的预测因素,但EI的自我报告测量增量解释了变革型领导力5%的方差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psihologijske teme
Psihologijske teme Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信