Restaging of rectal cancer with hybrid positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

IF 5.2 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Jeremy Tey, Jarrod Kh Tan, Ker-Kan Tan, Yu Yang Soon, Hoi Yin Loi, Jalila Sayed Adnan Mohamed, Padia Ankita Bakulbhai, Bertrand Ang, Thian Yee Liang
{"title":"Restaging of rectal cancer with hybrid positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.","authors":"Jeremy Tey, Jarrod Kh Tan, Ker-Kan Tan, Yu Yang Soon, Hoi Yin Loi, Jalila Sayed Adnan Mohamed, Padia Ankita Bakulbhai, Bertrand Ang, Thian Yee Liang","doi":"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study determines the sensitivity and specificity of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) parameters in predicting treatment response in patients with localised rectal cancer who have undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients with stage I-III adenocarcinoma of the rectum planned for preoperative CRT followed by surgery were recruited. Patients had PET/MRI scans at baseline and 6-8 weeks post-CRT. Functional MRI and PET parameters were assessed for their diagnostic accuracy for tumour regression grade (TRG). Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to determine the area under the ROC curve (AUC), and the sensitivity and specificity of each quantile cut-off.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 patients were recruited, of whom 20 completed study protocol. All patients included had mid or lower rectal tumours. There were 16 patients (80%) with node-positive disease at presentation. The median time to surgery was 75.5 days (range 52-106 days). Histopathological assessment revealed 20% good responders (TRG 1/2), and the remaining 80% of patients had a poor response (TRG 3/4). When predicting good responders, the AUC values for percent maximum thickness reduction and percent apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) change were 0.82 and 0.73, respectively. A maximum thickness reduction cut-off of >47% and a percent ADC change of >20% yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 75%/95% and 75%/73%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parameters such as percent maximum thickness reduction and percent ADC change may be useful for predicting good responders in patients undergoing preoperative CRT for rectal cancer. Larger studies are warranted to establish the utility of PET/MRI in rectal cancer staging.</p>","PeriodicalId":50774,"journal":{"name":"Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study determines the sensitivity and specificity of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) parameters in predicting treatment response in patients with localised rectal cancer who have undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Method: Patients with stage I-III adenocarcinoma of the rectum planned for preoperative CRT followed by surgery were recruited. Patients had PET/MRI scans at baseline and 6-8 weeks post-CRT. Functional MRI and PET parameters were assessed for their diagnostic accuracy for tumour regression grade (TRG). Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to determine the area under the ROC curve (AUC), and the sensitivity and specificity of each quantile cut-off.

Results: A total of 31 patients were recruited, of whom 20 completed study protocol. All patients included had mid or lower rectal tumours. There were 16 patients (80%) with node-positive disease at presentation. The median time to surgery was 75.5 days (range 52-106 days). Histopathological assessment revealed 20% good responders (TRG 1/2), and the remaining 80% of patients had a poor response (TRG 3/4). When predicting good responders, the AUC values for percent maximum thickness reduction and percent apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) change were 0.82 and 0.73, respectively. A maximum thickness reduction cut-off of >47% and a percent ADC change of >20% yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 75%/95% and 75%/73%, respectively.

Conclusion: Parameters such as percent maximum thickness reduction and percent ADC change may be useful for predicting good responders in patients undergoing preoperative CRT for rectal cancer. Larger studies are warranted to establish the utility of PET/MRI in rectal cancer staging.

混合正电子发射断层扫描磁共振成像在直肠癌术前放化疗后再灌注中的应用
简介:本研究确定了正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振成像(PET/MRI)参数预测局部直肠癌术前放化疗(CRT)患者治疗反应的敏感性和特异性。方法:选择术前计划行CRT手术的I-III期直肠腺癌患者。患者在基线和crt后6-8周进行PET/MRI扫描。评估功能性MRI和PET参数对肿瘤消退等级(TRG)的诊断准确性。采用非参数受试者工作特征分析确定ROC曲线下面积(AUC),以及各分位数截止点的敏感性和特异性。结果:共招募31例患者,其中20例完成了研究方案。所有患者均有中直肠或下直肠肿瘤。16例患者(80%)就诊时为淋巴结阳性。到手术的中位时间为75.5天(52-106天)。组织病理学评估显示20%的患者反应良好(TRG 1/2),其余80%的患者反应较差(TRG 3/4)。在预测良好应答时,最大厚度减少百分比和表观扩散系数(ADC)变化百分比的AUC分别为0.82和0.73。最大厚度减少临界值为47%,ADC变化百分比为20%,其敏感性和特异性分别为75%/95%和75%/73%。结论:最大厚度减少百分比和ADC改变百分比等参数可用于预测直肠癌术前CRT患者的良好反应。需要更大规模的研究来确定PET/MRI在直肠癌分期中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore
Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals is the official journal of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. Established in 1972, Annals is the leading medical journal in Singapore which aims to publish novel findings from clinical research as well as medical practices that can benefit the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信