Marriage Squeeze Among Highly Educated: Living Arrange-ments of Young Highly Educated Women in Europe

Q3 Social Sciences
Dana Hamplová
{"title":"Marriage Squeeze Among Highly Educated: Living Arrange-ments of Young Highly Educated Women in Europe","authors":"Dana Hamplová","doi":"10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.6.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marriage Squeeze Among Highly Educated: Living Arrangements of Young Highly Educated Women in Europe. This paper examines the role of occupational resources (field of occupation, socio-economic status, and income) in the odds of having a highly educated partner, having a partner with lower education, and staying single. The analysis of the EUSILC 2013 data demonstrate that women with better jobs and higher incomes have higher odds of living in a homogamous union with a highly educated partner. The data also show that if high resource women do not live with highly educated men, they are less likely to marry down compared to women with fewer resources and are more likely to stay single. Furthermore, the analysis demonstrates that women working in female-dominated professions are more likely to marry down and that the effect of the field cannot be explained by fewer personal resources. We also tested the idea that the link between individual resources and living arrangements is moderated by the female employment rate. We demonstrate that women are more likely to partner down in countries with higher female labor force participation. However, this tendency does not hold for high-income women. Sociológia 2020, Vol. 52 (No. 6: 599-623) https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.6.25","PeriodicalId":35251,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.6.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Marriage Squeeze Among Highly Educated: Living Arrangements of Young Highly Educated Women in Europe. This paper examines the role of occupational resources (field of occupation, socio-economic status, and income) in the odds of having a highly educated partner, having a partner with lower education, and staying single. The analysis of the EUSILC 2013 data demonstrate that women with better jobs and higher incomes have higher odds of living in a homogamous union with a highly educated partner. The data also show that if high resource women do not live with highly educated men, they are less likely to marry down compared to women with fewer resources and are more likely to stay single. Furthermore, the analysis demonstrates that women working in female-dominated professions are more likely to marry down and that the effect of the field cannot be explained by fewer personal resources. We also tested the idea that the link between individual resources and living arrangements is moderated by the female employment rate. We demonstrate that women are more likely to partner down in countries with higher female labor force participation. However, this tendency does not hold for high-income women. Sociológia 2020, Vol. 52 (No. 6: 599-623) https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.6.25
高学历女性的婚姻挤压:欧洲年轻高学历女性的生活安排
高学历女性的婚姻挤压:欧洲年轻高学历女性的生活安排。本文考察了职业资源(职业领域、社会经济地位和收入)在拥有高学历伴侣、低学历伴侣和保持单身的几率中的作用。对EUSILC 2013年数据的分析表明,工作更好、收入更高的女性与受过高等教育的伴侣生活在同性婚姻中的几率更高。数据还显示,如果资源丰富的女性没有与受过高等教育的男性生活在一起,那么与资源较少的女性相比,她们更不可能下嫁,也更有可能保持单身。此外,分析表明,在女性占主导地位的行业工作的女性更有可能下嫁,而且该领域的影响不能用个人资源较少来解释。我们还测试了个人资源和生活安排之间的联系受到女性就业率的调节这一观点。我们证明,在女性劳动力参与率较高的国家,女性更有可能成为伴侣。然而,这种趋势并不适用于高收入女性。Sociológia 2020, Vol. 52 (No. 6: 599-623) https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.6.25
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas
Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信