{"title":"The History of the Dead God – The Genesis of ‘the Death of God’ in Philosophy and Literature Before Nietzsche","authors":"Břetislav Horyna","doi":"10.5817/pf20-2-2178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few of the statements penned by philosophers have become as infamous as the “God is Dead!” of Friedrich Nietzsche. This study is not concerned with the reasons why this phrase is so popular. Instead, I would like to delve into the prehistory and partial genesis of the concept, something Nietzsche adopted from a previous tradition. Apart from known examples of theses on the death of God by Hegel, Schelling or Jean Paul, I will shed light on some of the confusion surrounding the phrase deus est mortuus in Mediaeval Christian liturgical literature and mysticism, with roots reaching back to Neoplatonism. The goal of this study is to point out that this phrase about the death of God had no significant constitutive meaning for Nietzsche but was, instead, a relatively common literary and rhetorical topos among other culturally diagnostic expressive elements. Nietzsche used it as an illustrative shortcut when describing the intercultural processes of his time, with no ambition to originality, instead, with the clear intention of shaking up the (non)thought of the comfortable bureaucrats and legalistic petit bourgeois of Germany in the late 19th century.","PeriodicalId":53428,"journal":{"name":"Pro-Fil","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro-Fil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/pf20-2-2178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Few of the statements penned by philosophers have become as infamous as the “God is Dead!” of Friedrich Nietzsche. This study is not concerned with the reasons why this phrase is so popular. Instead, I would like to delve into the prehistory and partial genesis of the concept, something Nietzsche adopted from a previous tradition. Apart from known examples of theses on the death of God by Hegel, Schelling or Jean Paul, I will shed light on some of the confusion surrounding the phrase deus est mortuus in Mediaeval Christian liturgical literature and mysticism, with roots reaching back to Neoplatonism. The goal of this study is to point out that this phrase about the death of God had no significant constitutive meaning for Nietzsche but was, instead, a relatively common literary and rhetorical topos among other culturally diagnostic expressive elements. Nietzsche used it as an illustrative shortcut when describing the intercultural processes of his time, with no ambition to originality, instead, with the clear intention of shaking up the (non)thought of the comfortable bureaucrats and legalistic petit bourgeois of Germany in the late 19th century.
很少有哲学家写过像“上帝死了!”弗里德里希·尼采的名言。这项研究并不关心这个短语如此流行的原因。相反,我想深入研究这个概念的史前和部分起源,这是尼采从之前的传统中采纳的东西。除了已知的黑格尔、谢林或让·保罗关于上帝之死的论文外,我将阐明围绕中世纪基督教礼拜文学和神秘主义中“deus est mortuus”一词的一些困惑,这些困惑的根源可以追溯到新柏拉图主义。本研究的目的是指出,这个关于上帝之死的短语对尼采来说没有重要的构成意义,相反,在其他文化诊断表达元素中,它是一个相对常见的文学和修辞主题。尼采在描述他那个时代的跨文化过程时,用它作为一个说明性的捷径,没有雄心勃勃地追求独创性,相反,他的明确意图是动摇19世纪后期德国安逸的官僚主义和法律主义小资产阶级的(非)思想。
期刊介绍:
Electronic journal of philosophy Pro-Fil is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes articles addressing a whole range of philosophical topics as well as contributions from natural sciences focusing on philosophically relevant issues. We welcome original papers, reviews, polemics, interviews, abstracts, announcements, audio and video recordings of lectures as well as instructional and educational materials in Czech, Slovak, English, and German.