Juan Carlos Corrales Guillén, Randall Gutiérrez Vargas, Gerardo Alonso Araya Varas, B. S. Ureña, J. Vargas, Daniel Rojas Valverde
{"title":"EFECTOS DEL CESPED ARTIFICIAL Y LA GRAMA NATURAL SOBRE EL RENDIMIENTO FÍSICO Y TÉCNICO DE LOS JUGADORES PROFESIONALES DE FÚTBOL","authors":"Juan Carlos Corrales Guillén, Randall Gutiérrez Vargas, Gerardo Alonso Araya Varas, B. S. Ureña, J. Vargas, Daniel Rojas Valverde","doi":"10.15359/mhs.14-1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of artificial turf (AT) and natural grass (NG) on the physical and technical performance of professional soccer players. A total of 17 healthy male soccer players (24.0 ± 4.1 years, height 174 ± 6.1 cm; body weight 73.4 ± 6.3 kg; body fat % 14.2 ± 2.3; VO2max 55.5 ± 5.3 ml/kg/min) from a Costa Rican Professional Soccer League club were subjected to different tests in both types of surfaces (technical test, agility test, repeated sprint ability test, and a small-sided game [8 minutes, 32 x 32 meters, 5 vs. 5]). Players were monitored using a GPS in two sessions, separated by 48 hours, during the club’s pre-season. There were no significant differences between the two types of surfaces for the technical, agility, and repeated sprint ability tests. The physiological and kinematic variables analyzed during the small-sided game presented significant differences in average heart rate (NG = 168.5 ± 8.8, AT = 154.8 ± 11.8, p <.001), maximum heart rate (NG = 183.2 ± 8.3, AT = 175.9 ± 10.4, p =.02), body load (NG = 34.3 ± 11.2, AT = 30.5 ± 11.4, p =.03), and total impacts (NG = 230.1 ± 89.5, AT = 194. 8 ± 86.4, p=.03). It is concluded that playing on the natural grass surface caused more impact on physiological and perceived body load in players. In the case of technical variables, it is concluded that there were no statistically significant differences between the two types of surfaces (p <0.05).","PeriodicalId":40930,"journal":{"name":"MHSalud-Revista en Ciencias del Movimiento Humano y la Salud","volume":"14 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15359/mhs.14-1.1","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MHSalud-Revista en Ciencias del Movimiento Humano y la Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15359/mhs.14-1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of artificial turf (AT) and natural grass (NG) on the physical and technical performance of professional soccer players. A total of 17 healthy male soccer players (24.0 ± 4.1 years, height 174 ± 6.1 cm; body weight 73.4 ± 6.3 kg; body fat % 14.2 ± 2.3; VO2max 55.5 ± 5.3 ml/kg/min) from a Costa Rican Professional Soccer League club were subjected to different tests in both types of surfaces (technical test, agility test, repeated sprint ability test, and a small-sided game [8 minutes, 32 x 32 meters, 5 vs. 5]). Players were monitored using a GPS in two sessions, separated by 48 hours, during the club’s pre-season. There were no significant differences between the two types of surfaces for the technical, agility, and repeated sprint ability tests. The physiological and kinematic variables analyzed during the small-sided game presented significant differences in average heart rate (NG = 168.5 ± 8.8, AT = 154.8 ± 11.8, p <.001), maximum heart rate (NG = 183.2 ± 8.3, AT = 175.9 ± 10.4, p =.02), body load (NG = 34.3 ± 11.2, AT = 30.5 ± 11.4, p =.03), and total impacts (NG = 230.1 ± 89.5, AT = 194. 8 ± 86.4, p=.03). It is concluded that playing on the natural grass surface caused more impact on physiological and perceived body load in players. In the case of technical variables, it is concluded that there were no statistically significant differences between the two types of surfaces (p <0.05).
本研究的目的是比较人工草皮(AT)和天然草地(NG)对职业足球运动员身体和技术性能的影响。来自哥斯达黎加职业足球联赛俱乐部的17名健康男性足球运动员(24.0±4.1岁,身高174±6.1厘米;体重73.4±6.3公斤;体脂%14.2±2.3;VO2max 55.5±5.3 ml/kg/分钟)在两种类型的表面上接受了不同的测试(技术测试、敏捷性测试、重复冲刺能力测试和小型比赛[8分钟,32 x 32米,5对5])在俱乐部的季前赛中,球员们分两次接受GPS监控,间隔48小时。在技术、敏捷性和重复冲刺能力测试中,这两种类型的表面没有显著差异。在小型比赛中分析的生理和运动学变量在平均心率(NG=168.5±8.8,AT=154.8±11.8,p<.001)、最大心率(NG=183.2±8.3,AT=175.9±10.4,p=.02)、身体负荷(NG=34.3±11.2,AT=30.5±11.4,p=.03)和总影响(NG=230.1±89.5,AT=194)方面存在显著差异。8±86.4,p=0.03)。结果表明,在天然草地上比赛对运动员的生理和感知身体负荷产生了更大的影响。在技术变量的情况下,得出的结论是,两种类型的表面之间没有统计学上的显著差异(p<0.05)。