Methodological approaches to the creation of the indices for a comprehensive assessment of the health state of the population and its provision of medical care

IF 5.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
V. Chorna, V. Dotsenko, V. Makhniuk, S. M. Mohilnyi, H. V. Ocheretiana
{"title":"Methodological approaches to the creation of the indices for a comprehensive assessment of the health state of the population and its provision of medical care","authors":"V. Chorna, V. Dotsenko, V. Makhniuk, S. M. Mohilnyi, H. V. Ocheretiana","doi":"10.32402/DOVKIL2021.01.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We developed and evaluated the calculation of the human health index (HHI) and the index of the medical provision of the population (IMPP) for a comprehensive assessment of the health state of the population, which would optimally aggregate the indicators of morbidity, disability, and mortality of the population. Materials and methods: In the study, we used the statistical data from the reference book of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine for 2017 on the incidence, disability, mortality of the population of Ukraine and the level of the provision of the medical care of the population, namely, the provision of doctors, nurses, and beds in the hospital to determine the human health index and the index of medical provision of the population of Ukraine. Results: The health index, developed by various authors, did not meet the requirements of the WHO and it has not found its application in healthcare practice yet. The Human Health Index (HHI) has been created by us by analogy with the methodology for the calculation of the Human Development Index (HDI). The calculations show that the lower the human health index, the health level of the population should be considered the worst, and the higher it is, the health level should be considered the best. Having calculated the average value of the index 0.603 and 0.117, we found that the average values of the index lie in the range of 0.603 ± 0.117, i.e., from 0.513 to 0.747.Values below 0.513 are considered low, and above 0.747 - high indices of human health. The average group values of the index of the medical provision of the population in the group of regions with a good health of the population were 0.601, with a satisfactory health – 0.515, with unsatisfactory health – 0.562. Analysis of variance showed that these values did not differ significantly from each other (F = 0.56; p> 0.05). Therefore, all groups of the population in the regions with different health levels have approximately the same level of medical care provision. Conclusions: The above results of the analysis using the necessary methods of mathematical statistics are a cause to assert that the proposed integral indices of human health and medical provision of the population, which adequately reflect the reality and simplicity of the application, can be recommended for the use in the practice of medical statistics both at the level of the Ministry of Health and at the level of the WHO. The level of the health of the population and its provision with medical care in the context of separate regions or countries can be compared with their help.","PeriodicalId":11686,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"20-28"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32402/DOVKIL2021.01.020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We developed and evaluated the calculation of the human health index (HHI) and the index of the medical provision of the population (IMPP) for a comprehensive assessment of the health state of the population, which would optimally aggregate the indicators of morbidity, disability, and mortality of the population. Materials and methods: In the study, we used the statistical data from the reference book of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine for 2017 on the incidence, disability, mortality of the population of Ukraine and the level of the provision of the medical care of the population, namely, the provision of doctors, nurses, and beds in the hospital to determine the human health index and the index of medical provision of the population of Ukraine. Results: The health index, developed by various authors, did not meet the requirements of the WHO and it has not found its application in healthcare practice yet. The Human Health Index (HHI) has been created by us by analogy with the methodology for the calculation of the Human Development Index (HDI). The calculations show that the lower the human health index, the health level of the population should be considered the worst, and the higher it is, the health level should be considered the best. Having calculated the average value of the index 0.603 and 0.117, we found that the average values of the index lie in the range of 0.603 ± 0.117, i.e., from 0.513 to 0.747.Values below 0.513 are considered low, and above 0.747 - high indices of human health. The average group values of the index of the medical provision of the population in the group of regions with a good health of the population were 0.601, with a satisfactory health – 0.515, with unsatisfactory health – 0.562. Analysis of variance showed that these values did not differ significantly from each other (F = 0.56; p> 0.05). Therefore, all groups of the population in the regions with different health levels have approximately the same level of medical care provision. Conclusions: The above results of the analysis using the necessary methods of mathematical statistics are a cause to assert that the proposed integral indices of human health and medical provision of the population, which adequately reflect the reality and simplicity of the application, can be recommended for the use in the practice of medical statistics both at the level of the Ministry of Health and at the level of the WHO. The level of the health of the population and its provision with medical care in the context of separate regions or countries can be compared with their help.
制定综合评估人口健康状况及其提供医疗服务的指数的方法方法
目的:我们开发并评估了人类健康指数(HHI)和人口医疗供应指数(IMPP)的计算方法,以全面评估人口的健康状况,从而最佳地汇总人口的发病率、残疾和死亡率指标。材料和方法:在这项研究中,我们使用了乌克兰卫生部2017年参考书中关于乌克兰人口发病率、残疾率、死亡率和人口医疗服务水平的统计数据,即医生、护士、,以及医院的床位,以确定乌克兰人口的人类健康指数和医疗供应指数。结果:不同作者开发的健康指数不符合世界卫生组织的要求,尚未在医疗实践中得到应用。人类健康指数(HHI)是我们通过类比人类发展指数(HDI)的计算方法而创建的。计算表明,人类健康指数越低,人群的健康水平就应该被认为是最差的,而健康指数越高,健康水平就应被认为是最好的。在计算了指数0.603和0.117的平均值后,我们发现该指数的平均值在0.603±0.117的范围内,即从0.513到0.747。低于0.513的值被认为是低的,高于0.747的值则是高的人类健康指数。在人口健康状况良好的地区组中,人口医疗供应指数的平均组值为0.601,健康状况良好为0.515,健康状况不佳为0.562。方差分析显示,这些值之间没有显著差异(F=0.56;p>0.05)。因此,不同健康水平地区的所有人群的医疗服务水平大致相同。结论:使用必要的数理统计方法进行的上述分析结果表明,所提出的人类健康和人口医疗供应的综合指数充分反映了应用的真实性和简单性,可推荐在卫生部一级和世界卫生组织一级的医疗统计实践中使用。人口的健康水平及其在不同地区或国家提供的医疗服务可以与他们的帮助进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Health
Environmental Health 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
115
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health publishes manuscripts on all aspects of environmental and occupational medicine and related studies in toxicology and epidemiology. Environmental Health is aimed at scientists and practitioners in all areas of environmental science where human health and well-being are involved, either directly or indirectly. Environmental Health is a public health journal serving the public health community and scientists working on matters of public health interest and importance pertaining to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信