Long-term effectiveness and safety of medical cannabis administered through the metered-dose Syqe Inhaler

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Joshua Aviram, D. Atzmony, E. Eisenberg
{"title":"Long-term effectiveness and safety of medical cannabis administered through the metered-dose Syqe Inhaler","authors":"Joshua Aviram, D. Atzmony, E. Eisenberg","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Administration of low-dose medical cannabis through the metered-dose Syqe Inhaler demonstrates similar effectiveness on pain reduction and superior safety compared with other higher-dose administration routes. Abstract Introduction: Preliminary clinical studies on medical cannabis (MC) treatment using the Syqe Inhaler showed short-term effectiveness and safety at very low and precise doses of MC. Objectives: Here, we retrospectively analyzed “real-life” long-term data collected in real time on the potential effectiveness and safety of MC administered with this device. Methods: Patients were monitored by Syqe's patient support program. (−)-Δ9-trans-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) served as a dosage marker for full-spectrum MC. Pain intensity was evaluated using a numeric pain scale (NPS) from baseline to 120 days after treatment initiation. The change in quality of life (QoL) from baseline was evaluated. Adverse events (AEs) were followed up continuously for 15 months. Results: Of the 143 patients (mean age 62 ± 17 years; 54% males) included in the analysis, most (72%) were diagnosed with chronic neuropathic pain. The stable daily dose, after a mean 26 ± 10 days of titration was 1,500 ± 688 μg aerosolized Δ9-THC. Significant pain reduction, ranging from 22.8% in the intent-to-treat population to 28.4% in the population that reported baseline pain intensity ≥8 points on the NPS (P < 0.001), was observed. Ninety-two percent of patients reported improved QoL. Adverse events were reported mostly during the titration phase (34% of patients) and declined to ≤4% at 3 to 15 months. Only 7% of patients reported psychoactive AEs (anxiety and restlessness). Conclusions: Medical cannabis treatment with the Syqe Inhaler demonstrated overall long-term pain reduction, QoL improvement, and a superior AE profile compared with administration of MC by conventional routes. Additional follow-up in a larger population is warranted.","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Administration of low-dose medical cannabis through the metered-dose Syqe Inhaler demonstrates similar effectiveness on pain reduction and superior safety compared with other higher-dose administration routes. Abstract Introduction: Preliminary clinical studies on medical cannabis (MC) treatment using the Syqe Inhaler showed short-term effectiveness and safety at very low and precise doses of MC. Objectives: Here, we retrospectively analyzed “real-life” long-term data collected in real time on the potential effectiveness and safety of MC administered with this device. Methods: Patients were monitored by Syqe's patient support program. (−)-Δ9-trans-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) served as a dosage marker for full-spectrum MC. Pain intensity was evaluated using a numeric pain scale (NPS) from baseline to 120 days after treatment initiation. The change in quality of life (QoL) from baseline was evaluated. Adverse events (AEs) were followed up continuously for 15 months. Results: Of the 143 patients (mean age 62 ± 17 years; 54% males) included in the analysis, most (72%) were diagnosed with chronic neuropathic pain. The stable daily dose, after a mean 26 ± 10 days of titration was 1,500 ± 688 μg aerosolized Δ9-THC. Significant pain reduction, ranging from 22.8% in the intent-to-treat population to 28.4% in the population that reported baseline pain intensity ≥8 points on the NPS (P < 0.001), was observed. Ninety-two percent of patients reported improved QoL. Adverse events were reported mostly during the titration phase (34% of patients) and declined to ≤4% at 3 to 15 months. Only 7% of patients reported psychoactive AEs (anxiety and restlessness). Conclusions: Medical cannabis treatment with the Syqe Inhaler demonstrated overall long-term pain reduction, QoL improvement, and a superior AE profile compared with administration of MC by conventional routes. Additional follow-up in a larger population is warranted.
通过计量剂量Syqe吸入器施用医用大麻的长期有效性和安全性
文本中提供了补充数字内容。与其他高剂量给药途径相比,通过计量剂量Syqe吸入器给药低剂量医用大麻在减轻疼痛方面表现出类似的有效性和优越的安全性。摘要简介:使用Syqe吸入器治疗医用大麻(MC)的初步临床研究表明,在非常低和精确的MC剂量下,短期有效性和安全性。目的:在这里,我们回顾性分析了实时收集的“真实”长期数据,这些数据表明使用该设备治疗MC的潜在有效性和安全性。方法:采用Syqe患者支持计划对患者进行监测。(−)-Δ9-反式四氢大麻酚(Δ9-THC)作为全谱MC的剂量标记。从基线到治疗开始后120天,使用数字疼痛量表(NPS)评估疼痛强度。评估生活质量(QoL)与基线相比的变化。不良事件(AE)持续随访15个月。结果:在纳入分析的143名患者(平均年龄62±17岁;54%为男性)中,大多数(72%)被诊断为慢性神经性疼痛。平均滴定26±10天后的稳定日剂量为1500±688μg雾化Δ9-THC。观察到显著的疼痛减轻,从意向治疗人群的22.8%到报告NPS基线疼痛强度≥8分的人群的28.4%(P<0.001)。92%的患者报告生活质量改善。不良事件主要发生在滴定阶段(34%的患者),在3至15个月时降至≤4%。只有7%的患者报告了精神活动性AE(焦虑和不安)。结论:与传统途径给予MC相比,使用Syqe吸入器进行医用大麻治疗显示出总体的长期疼痛减轻、生活质量改善和良好的AE表现。有必要在更大的人群中采取更多的后续行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信