The distal femoral epiphysis used as a fetal maturity marker: Implications of extant medical data for bioarcheological analysis

IF 1.1 3区 历史学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Caroline Partiot, Frédéric Santos, Mélissa Niel, Clémence Delteil, Emmanuelle Lesieur, Kathia Chaumoitre, Marie-Dominique Piercecchi, Pascal Adalian
{"title":"The distal femoral epiphysis used as a fetal maturity marker: Implications of extant medical data for bioarcheological analysis","authors":"Caroline Partiot,&nbsp;Frédéric Santos,&nbsp;Mélissa Niel,&nbsp;Clémence Delteil,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Lesieur,&nbsp;Kathia Chaumoitre,&nbsp;Marie-Dominique Piercecchi,&nbsp;Pascal Adalian","doi":"10.1002/oa.3240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The distal epiphysis of the femur is classically reported as a marker of fetal maturity and is thus identified in a bioarcheological context as an indicator that an individual died at or around the time of birth; it thus provides crucial information in the creation of the biological profile and associated burial practices. The aim of the present study was to re-evaluate this use by investigating an extant sample to assess (i) the age-related frequencies of both distal femoral and proximal tibial epiphyses and (ii) the influence of factors such as sex, vitality, and morbidity on the maturation of both epiphyses. The study was conducted on medical CT scans acquired in utero and ex utero between 2008 and 2017 in the hospital of Marseille (France). The final sample included 248 individuals aged between 26 and 42 completed gestational weeks (GW). Based on the results obtained in this study, 11% of the individuals from the sample aged between 26 and 33 completed GW had already developed a distal femoral epiphysis, whereas individuals aged between 38 and 42 GW had already developed both femoral and tibial epiphyses. According to these observations and current obstetrical practice, this maturation indicator cannot therefore be considered a precise estimator of whether a fetus is at term or not in an archeological context. Similarly, no delayed ossification was found among individuals who did not survive to 42 GW, or among those with severe developmental abnormalities, which does not support the hypothesis that delayed epiphysis maturation of the distal femur may be a morbidity marker for this age group in past populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14179,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","volume":"33 5","pages":"868-875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oa.3240","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.3240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The distal epiphysis of the femur is classically reported as a marker of fetal maturity and is thus identified in a bioarcheological context as an indicator that an individual died at or around the time of birth; it thus provides crucial information in the creation of the biological profile and associated burial practices. The aim of the present study was to re-evaluate this use by investigating an extant sample to assess (i) the age-related frequencies of both distal femoral and proximal tibial epiphyses and (ii) the influence of factors such as sex, vitality, and morbidity on the maturation of both epiphyses. The study was conducted on medical CT scans acquired in utero and ex utero between 2008 and 2017 in the hospital of Marseille (France). The final sample included 248 individuals aged between 26 and 42 completed gestational weeks (GW). Based on the results obtained in this study, 11% of the individuals from the sample aged between 26 and 33 completed GW had already developed a distal femoral epiphysis, whereas individuals aged between 38 and 42 GW had already developed both femoral and tibial epiphyses. According to these observations and current obstetrical practice, this maturation indicator cannot therefore be considered a precise estimator of whether a fetus is at term or not in an archeological context. Similarly, no delayed ossification was found among individuals who did not survive to 42 GW, or among those with severe developmental abnormalities, which does not support the hypothesis that delayed epiphysis maturation of the distal femur may be a morbidity marker for this age group in past populations.

Abstract Image

股骨远端骨骺用作胎儿成熟标志物:现有医学数据对生物地质分析的意义
股骨远端骨骺通常被认为是胎儿成熟的标志,因此在生物考古学背景下被确定为个体在出生时或出生前后死亡的指标;因此,它为建立生物剖面和相关的埋葬习俗提供了重要信息。本研究的目的是通过调查现有样本来重新评估这一用途,以评估(i)股骨远端和胫骨近端骨骺的年龄相关频率,以及(ii)性别、活力和发病率等因素对两种骨骺成熟的影响。该研究是对2008年至2017年在法国马赛医院进行的子宫和子宫外医学CT扫描进行的。最终样本包括248名年龄在26至42孕周(GW)之间的个体。根据本研究获得的结果,年龄在26至33岁之间完成GW的样本中有11%的个体已经发展为股骨远端骨骺,而年龄在38至42 GW之间的个体已经发展为股骨和胫骨骨骺。根据这些观察和目前的产科实践,在考古学的背景下,这个成熟指标不能被认为是胎儿是否足月的精确估计。同样,在未存活至42 GW或有严重发育异常的个体中未发现延迟骨化,这不支持股骨远端骨骺成熟延迟可能是过去人群中该年龄组发病率标志的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: The aim of the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology is to provide a forum for the publication of papers dealing with all aspects of the study of human and animal bones from archaeological contexts. The journal will publish original papers dealing with human or animal bone research from any area of the world. It will also publish short papers which give important preliminary observations from work in progress and it will publish book reviews. All papers will be subject to peer review. The journal will be aimed principally towards all those with a professional interest in the study of human and animal bones. This includes archaeologists, anthropologists, human and animal bone specialists, palaeopathologists and medical historians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信