Research on the Different Frequencies of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation for Postpartum Pelvic Girdle Pain

Duomei Ren, Chun-Lang Yang, Fenghua Yuan, Yanni Wang
{"title":"Research on the Different Frequencies of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation for Postpartum Pelvic Girdle Pain","authors":"Duomei Ren, Chun-Lang Yang, Fenghua Yuan, Yanni Wang","doi":"10.26689/jcnr.v7i2.4801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To observe the clinical effect of different frequencies of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation in treating postpartum pelvic girdle pain and promoting postpartum rehabilitation. Methods: From January to September 2022, 300 patients with pelvic girdle pain after spontaneous delivery in a hospital in Shaanxi Province were selected and randomly divided into three groups, low frequency, high frequency, and alternating frequency, with 100 cases in each group. In addition to routine postpartum care and psychological counseling, the three groups received transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation at low-frequency (2 Hz,) high-frequency (100 Hz), and alternating frequency (2/100 Hz), respectively. The differences in initial pain, pain scores before and after treatment, satisfaction with analgesic effect, and postpartum rehabilitation effect were evaluated among the three groups of patients. Results: There was a significant correlation between maternal age and postpartum pelvic girdle pain (P < 0.001), but no correlation was observed between newborn birth weight and postpartum pelvic girdle pain (P > 0.05). After 1d/2d of treatment, the pain scores and rehabilitation effect of patients in the alternating-frequency group and low-frequency group were significantly better than those in the high-frequency group, and the postpartum curative effect of patients in the alternating-frequency group was the best, followed by the low-frequency group, and the high-frequency group; the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Among the three groups, the alternating-frequency group had the highest satisfaction with the analgesic effect and the highest rate of selecting the same analgesic regimen the next time; the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation at different frequencies is safe and effective in treating postpartum pelvic girdle pain and beneficial to postpartum rehabilitation. Sparse-dense wave stimulation is effective in treating postpartum pelvic girdle pain. It has the best effect in promoting postpartum rehabilitation and the highest patient satisfaction. Therefore, its application in clinical practice is highly recommended.","PeriodicalId":64151,"journal":{"name":"临床护理研究","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"临床护理研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/jcnr.v7i2.4801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of different frequencies of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation in treating postpartum pelvic girdle pain and promoting postpartum rehabilitation. Methods: From January to September 2022, 300 patients with pelvic girdle pain after spontaneous delivery in a hospital in Shaanxi Province were selected and randomly divided into three groups, low frequency, high frequency, and alternating frequency, with 100 cases in each group. In addition to routine postpartum care and psychological counseling, the three groups received transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation at low-frequency (2 Hz,) high-frequency (100 Hz), and alternating frequency (2/100 Hz), respectively. The differences in initial pain, pain scores before and after treatment, satisfaction with analgesic effect, and postpartum rehabilitation effect were evaluated among the three groups of patients. Results: There was a significant correlation between maternal age and postpartum pelvic girdle pain (P < 0.001), but no correlation was observed between newborn birth weight and postpartum pelvic girdle pain (P > 0.05). After 1d/2d of treatment, the pain scores and rehabilitation effect of patients in the alternating-frequency group and low-frequency group were significantly better than those in the high-frequency group, and the postpartum curative effect of patients in the alternating-frequency group was the best, followed by the low-frequency group, and the high-frequency group; the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Among the three groups, the alternating-frequency group had the highest satisfaction with the analgesic effect and the highest rate of selecting the same analgesic regimen the next time; the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation at different frequencies is safe and effective in treating postpartum pelvic girdle pain and beneficial to postpartum rehabilitation. Sparse-dense wave stimulation is effective in treating postpartum pelvic girdle pain. It has the best effect in promoting postpartum rehabilitation and the highest patient satisfaction. Therefore, its application in clinical practice is highly recommended.
不同频率经皮穴位电刺激治疗产后盆腔疼痛的研究
目的:观察不同频率经皮穴位电刺激治疗产后骨盆带疼痛,促进产后康复的临床效果。方法:选取2022年1-9月陕西省某医院300例顺产后骨盆带疼痛患者,随机分为低频、高频、交变三组,每组100例。除了常规的产后护理和心理咨询外,三组分别接受低频(2Hz)、高频(100Hz)和交变频率(2/100Hz)的经皮穴位电刺激。评估三组患者在初始疼痛、治疗前后疼痛评分、镇痛效果满意度和产后康复效果方面的差异。结果:产妇年龄与产后围带痛有显著相关性(P<0.001),新生儿出生体重与产后围束痛无相关性(P>0.05),交变频率组和低频组患者的疼痛评分和康复效果明显优于高频组,其中交变频率组患者产后疗效最好,其次是低频组和高频组;三组中,交替频率组对镇痛效果的满意度最高,下次选择相同镇痛方案的比率最高;结论:不同频率经皮穴位电刺激治疗产后骨盆带疼痛安全有效,有利于产后康复。稀疏密集波刺激治疗产后骨盆带疼痛疗效确切。它在促进产后康复方面效果最好,患者满意度最高。因此,强烈建议将其应用于临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信