Panpsychism and Pantheism. An Uneasy Alliance?

Q2 Arts and Humanities
J. Jarocki
{"title":"Panpsychism and Pantheism. An Uneasy Alliance?","authors":"J. Jarocki","doi":"10.18290/rf237102.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although panpsychism and pantheism were seen as natural allies in the past, in contemporary philosophy it is widely common to stress differences rather than similarities between them. As a result, only few panpsychists (e.g. so-called cosmopsychists) acknowledge that their view may imply pantheism. In my paper, I argue that at least some popular versions of panpsychism do lead to pantheism. My main argument is that panpsychism meets the minimal requirements for pantheism, defined as a view that the world is identical to all-encompassing Unity and that this Unity is divine. Although there are kinds of panpsychism that allow one to avoid these consequences, the most popular versions of this view pave the way to pantheism. \nMany philosophers will find this a serious challenge for panpsychism. On the other hand, it can be argued that this conclusion is not as grim as it seems. An all-encompassing Cosmic Mind has little to do with the God of Abrahamic religions, so it does not necessarily deprive panpsychism of its naturalistic flavor that many find non-negotiable. Be that as it may, the aim of this paper is to turn the attention of proponents of panpsychism to yet another problem they need to solve.","PeriodicalId":35732,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Filozoficzne","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Filozoficzne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18290/rf237102.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although panpsychism and pantheism were seen as natural allies in the past, in contemporary philosophy it is widely common to stress differences rather than similarities between them. As a result, only few panpsychists (e.g. so-called cosmopsychists) acknowledge that their view may imply pantheism. In my paper, I argue that at least some popular versions of panpsychism do lead to pantheism. My main argument is that panpsychism meets the minimal requirements for pantheism, defined as a view that the world is identical to all-encompassing Unity and that this Unity is divine. Although there are kinds of panpsychism that allow one to avoid these consequences, the most popular versions of this view pave the way to pantheism. Many philosophers will find this a serious challenge for panpsychism. On the other hand, it can be argued that this conclusion is not as grim as it seems. An all-encompassing Cosmic Mind has little to do with the God of Abrahamic religions, so it does not necessarily deprive panpsychism of its naturalistic flavor that many find non-negotiable. Be that as it may, the aim of this paper is to turn the attention of proponents of panpsychism to yet another problem they need to solve.
泛精神主义和泛神论。不安的联盟?
尽管泛灵教和泛神论在过去被视为天生的盟友,但在当代哲学中,强调它们之间的差异而不是相似性是普遍的。因此,只有少数泛灵媒学家(例如所谓的宇宙灵媒学家)承认他们的观点可能意味着泛神论。在我的论文中,我认为至少一些流行的泛灵媒论确实导致了泛灵媒主义。我的主要论点是泛灵教满足了泛灵教的最低要求,泛灵教被定义为一种观点,即世界与包罗万象的统一是相同的,这种统一是神圣的。尽管有各种泛灵教可以避免这些后果,但这种观点最流行的版本为泛灵教铺平了道路。许多哲学家会发现这对泛精神主义来说是一个严峻的挑战。另一方面,可以说,这一结论并不像看上去那么严峻。一个包罗万象的宇宙思维与亚伯拉罕宗教的上帝几乎没有关系,因此它不一定会剥夺泛灵主义的自然主义色彩,而许多人认为这是不可谈判的。尽管如此,这篇论文的目的是将泛精神主义支持者的注意力转向他们需要解决的另一个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Roczniki Filozoficzne Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Annals of Philosophy is one of the oldest philosophical journals in Poland (since 1948). It is published four times per year in both the online and traditional ways. The journal aims to publish the best original research papers in philosophy, as well as translations, reviews, accounts and polemics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信