Association of cesarean delivery timing with pelvic floor muscle function and urine incontinence: A propensity score-matched study.

Smart medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-27 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1002/SMMD.20220018
Yiyao Chen, Chuangchuang Xu, Qimanguli Saiding, Xiaolei Chi, Lei Chu, Xianjing Wang, Xinliang Chen
{"title":"Association of cesarean delivery timing with pelvic floor muscle function and urine incontinence: A propensity score-matched study.","authors":"Yiyao Chen, Chuangchuang Xu, Qimanguli Saiding, Xiaolei Chi, Lei Chu, Xianjing Wang, Xinliang Chen","doi":"10.1002/SMMD.20220018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common gynecological disease that adversely affects women's quality of life and mental health. Delivery is considered a significant independent risk factor for pelvic floor dysfunction. Surface electromyography (sEMG) values for the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) have been shown to differ according to different delivery modes. This study aimed to compare sEMG results between intrapartum and antepartum cesarean delivery (CD), 42-60 days after delivery. Data of women who underwent CD at the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital were collected from September 2021 to December 2021. Myotrac Infiniti System was used to measure the electromyographic activity of PFM after 42-60 days of parturition. Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied to achieve a balance in baseline data between the two groups (intrapartum and antepartum CD). A total of 200 paired cases were selected for statistical analysis. In the propensity score-matched analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in PFM sEMG between women with antepartum or intrapartum CD (<i>p</i> > 0.05 for all). We observed similar results with postpartum urinary incontinence (24 [12.0] vs. 21 [10.5]; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.12 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-2.12]; <i>p</i> = 0.717) and stress urinary incontinence (12 [6.0] vs. 14 [7.0]; aOR, 0.80 [95% CI 0.35-1.80]; <i>p</i> = 0.596) as outcomes. After excluding participants with intrapartum CD when the cervix was dilated <6 cm, all sEMG of PFM had a comparable level of risk in both the antepartum and intrapartum CD groups. There were no significant differences in sEMG of the PFM and the incidence of urinary incontinence between patients undergoing intrapartum or antepartum CD. Excluding women who underwent intrapartum CD when the cervix was dilated to <6 cm produced little change in results. Thus, different opportunities for CD may not impact the sEMG of the PFM and the incidence of urinary incontinence.</p>","PeriodicalId":74816,"journal":{"name":"Smart medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e20220018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11235817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/SMMD.20220018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common gynecological disease that adversely affects women's quality of life and mental health. Delivery is considered a significant independent risk factor for pelvic floor dysfunction. Surface electromyography (sEMG) values for the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) have been shown to differ according to different delivery modes. This study aimed to compare sEMG results between intrapartum and antepartum cesarean delivery (CD), 42-60 days after delivery. Data of women who underwent CD at the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital were collected from September 2021 to December 2021. Myotrac Infiniti System was used to measure the electromyographic activity of PFM after 42-60 days of parturition. Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied to achieve a balance in baseline data between the two groups (intrapartum and antepartum CD). A total of 200 paired cases were selected for statistical analysis. In the propensity score-matched analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in PFM sEMG between women with antepartum or intrapartum CD (p > 0.05 for all). We observed similar results with postpartum urinary incontinence (24 [12.0] vs. 21 [10.5]; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.12 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-2.12]; p = 0.717) and stress urinary incontinence (12 [6.0] vs. 14 [7.0]; aOR, 0.80 [95% CI 0.35-1.80]; p = 0.596) as outcomes. After excluding participants with intrapartum CD when the cervix was dilated <6 cm, all sEMG of PFM had a comparable level of risk in both the antepartum and intrapartum CD groups. There were no significant differences in sEMG of the PFM and the incidence of urinary incontinence between patients undergoing intrapartum or antepartum CD. Excluding women who underwent intrapartum CD when the cervix was dilated to <6 cm produced little change in results. Thus, different opportunities for CD may not impact the sEMG of the PFM and the incidence of urinary incontinence.

剖宫产时机与盆底肌肉功能和尿失禁的关系:一项倾向评分匹配研究
盆底功能障碍是一种常见的妇科疾病,对妇女的生活质量和心理健康造成不利影响。分娩被认为是盆底功能障碍的一个重要独立风险因素。已有研究表明,盆底肌(PFM)的表面肌电图(sEMG)值因分娩方式的不同而不同。本研究旨在比较产中和产前剖宫产(CD)产妇在产后 42-60 天的肌电图结果。研究收集了 2021 年 9 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在国际和平妇幼保健院接受剖宫产的产妇数据。使用 Myotrac Infiniti 系统测量产后 42-60 天的 PFM 肌电活动。采用倾向得分匹配法(1:1)来平衡两组(产中和产前 CD)的基线数据。共选取了 200 个配对病例进行统计分析。在倾向得分匹配分析中,产前或产后 CD 妇女的 PFM sEMG 在统计学上没有显著差异(所有差异的 p > 0.05)。我们观察到产后尿失禁(24 [12.0] 对 21 [10.5];调整后比值比 (aOR),1.12 [95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.60-2.12];p = 0.717)和压力性尿失禁(12 [6.0] 对 14 [7.0];aOR,0.80 [95% CI 0.35-1.80];p = 0.596)的结果相似。在排除了宫颈扩张的产前 CD 患者后
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信