Situating Students’ Achievement and Perceptions of Inquiry-Oriented Instruction within Their Motivational Beliefs: A Mixed Methods Study

Q2 Mathematics
Karen Zwanch, Brooke Mullins, Nicholas Fortune, K. Keene
{"title":"Situating Students’ Achievement and Perceptions of Inquiry-Oriented Instruction within Their Motivational Beliefs: A Mixed Methods Study","authors":"Karen Zwanch, Brooke Mullins, Nicholas Fortune, K. Keene","doi":"10.1080/19477503.2021.1884446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Students’ perceptions of the mathematics classroom environment have been linked to both cognitive and affective outcomes, as has inquiry-oriented instruction (IOI). The purpose of this mixed methods study is to determine what undergraduate students’ perceptions of inquiry-oriented differential equations are, and the extent to which their perceptions are related to their academic achievement. The results are framed using motivational theory. Results are that students’ perceptions of IOI fit within four themes: Engaging with Math and Each Other, Less to Know, Feelings of Frustration, and Resistance to IOI. Furthermore, a linear mixed model indicated that students with positive and neutral perceptions of IOI are predicted to score approximately 10% higher on the end of course assessment than are their peers with negative perceptions of IOI. Qualitative and quantitative results are linked by expectancy-value theory, which leads to the conclusion that students who perceive of IOI as useful to their learning and who perceive that they can be successful in IOI have significantly higher achievement in an undergraduate mathematics course.","PeriodicalId":36817,"journal":{"name":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","volume":"13 1","pages":"141 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19477503.2021.1884446","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2021.1884446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Students’ perceptions of the mathematics classroom environment have been linked to both cognitive and affective outcomes, as has inquiry-oriented instruction (IOI). The purpose of this mixed methods study is to determine what undergraduate students’ perceptions of inquiry-oriented differential equations are, and the extent to which their perceptions are related to their academic achievement. The results are framed using motivational theory. Results are that students’ perceptions of IOI fit within four themes: Engaging with Math and Each Other, Less to Know, Feelings of Frustration, and Resistance to IOI. Furthermore, a linear mixed model indicated that students with positive and neutral perceptions of IOI are predicted to score approximately 10% higher on the end of course assessment than are their peers with negative perceptions of IOI. Qualitative and quantitative results are linked by expectancy-value theory, which leads to the conclusion that students who perceive of IOI as useful to their learning and who perceive that they can be successful in IOI have significantly higher achievement in an undergraduate mathematics course.
在动机信念中定位学生探究性教学的成就与认知:一项混合方法研究
学生对数学课堂环境的感知与认知和情感结果有关,探究导向教学(IOI)也是如此。这项混合方法研究的目的是确定本科生对探究型微分方程的感知是什么,以及他们的感知与学业成绩的关系程度。结果是用动机理论构建的。结果表明,学生对IOI的看法符合四个主题:与数学和彼此互动,知之甚少,挫折感和对IOI的抵制。此外,一个线性混合模型表明,对IOI有积极和中性看法的学生在课程结束评估中的得分预计比对IOI有消极看法的同龄人高出约10%。定性和定量结果通过期望值理论联系在一起,从而得出结论,认为IOI对他们的学习有用并认为他们可以在IOI中取得成功的学生在本科数学课程中取得显著更高的成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigations in Mathematics Learning
Investigations in Mathematics Learning Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信