Furcation: the truth behind the roots!!!

Smita Rahangdale prof, Sushama R Galgali Hod, Hema Suryavanshi Prof, Lubna Siddiqui Lect
{"title":"Furcation: the truth behind the roots!!!","authors":"Smita Rahangdale prof, Sushama R Galgali Hod, Hema Suryavanshi Prof, Lubna Siddiqui Lect","doi":"10.33882/jida.14.25414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: \nComplex anatomic morphology of bifurcations and trifurcations predisposes multirooted teeth to plaque accumulation leading to periodontal infection. This poses a great difficulty in treatment planning and management of these furcation defects.Assessing the degree of furcation involvement depending on external tooth surface points may lead to the underestimation of positive treatment outcomes.\n\nAim: \nTo determine the buccolingual width of the furcation of mandibular molar and compare it with buccolingual width of mesial and distal roots at the level of root separation.\n\nMaterials and Methods: 40 randomly selected mandibular molars were analyzed in which 20 first molars and 20 second molars were included. Four horizontal buccolingual distances were evaluated: CEJ, Furcation entrance/ roof width (FE), Mesial root width (MRW), andDistal root width (DRW).Discrepancies between FE measurements and MRW, DRW, and CEJ were determined in each tooth by subtracting the FE measurements respectively from MRW, DRW, and CEJ. \n\nResults: The width of the furcation entrance has a mean of 5.41 ± 0.67 mm varying from 4 to 7 mm in first molars and a mean of 5.18 ± 0.64 mm varying from 4 to 6 mm in second molars. \nIn this study, the FE is measured more internally than the mesial and distal root surfaces and therefore, the FE is smaller than MRW and DRW.From this, it is evident that the actual furcation width is much less than the CEJ width, MRW and DRW measured buccolingually.\n\nConclusion: Clinical measurements of horizontal probing depth that use the external surfaces of roots as reference points overestimate the true anatomical component of furcation involvement in mandibular molars. Conversely, positive treatment outcomes in these teeth may be underestimated.Thus, estimation of actual furcation entrance width before a surgical intervention is necessary and can influence the prognosis of involved teeth after different regenerative therapies for furcation defects.\n\nKey words : Furcation therapy, molar anatomy, periodontal attachment loss/diagnosis, outcome assessment of regenerative therapies.","PeriodicalId":76040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Dental Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33882/jida.14.25414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Complex anatomic morphology of bifurcations and trifurcations predisposes multirooted teeth to plaque accumulation leading to periodontal infection. This poses a great difficulty in treatment planning and management of these furcation defects.Assessing the degree of furcation involvement depending on external tooth surface points may lead to the underestimation of positive treatment outcomes. Aim: To determine the buccolingual width of the furcation of mandibular molar and compare it with buccolingual width of mesial and distal roots at the level of root separation. Materials and Methods: 40 randomly selected mandibular molars were analyzed in which 20 first molars and 20 second molars were included. Four horizontal buccolingual distances were evaluated: CEJ, Furcation entrance/ roof width (FE), Mesial root width (MRW), andDistal root width (DRW).Discrepancies between FE measurements and MRW, DRW, and CEJ were determined in each tooth by subtracting the FE measurements respectively from MRW, DRW, and CEJ. Results: The width of the furcation entrance has a mean of 5.41 ± 0.67 mm varying from 4 to 7 mm in first molars and a mean of 5.18 ± 0.64 mm varying from 4 to 6 mm in second molars. In this study, the FE is measured more internally than the mesial and distal root surfaces and therefore, the FE is smaller than MRW and DRW.From this, it is evident that the actual furcation width is much less than the CEJ width, MRW and DRW measured buccolingually. Conclusion: Clinical measurements of horizontal probing depth that use the external surfaces of roots as reference points overestimate the true anatomical component of furcation involvement in mandibular molars. Conversely, positive treatment outcomes in these teeth may be underestimated.Thus, estimation of actual furcation entrance width before a surgical intervention is necessary and can influence the prognosis of involved teeth after different regenerative therapies for furcation defects. Key words : Furcation therapy, molar anatomy, periodontal attachment loss/diagnosis, outcome assessment of regenerative therapies.
分叉:根源背后的真相!!
背景:分叉和三分叉复杂的解剖形态易使多根牙菌斑积聚导致牙周感染。这给这些功能缺陷的治疗计划和管理带来了很大的困难。根据外牙表面的点来评估分岔的受损伤程度可能会导致对积极治疗结果的低估。目的:测定下颌磨牙分叉的颊舌宽度,并与近、远根分离水平下的颊舌宽度进行比较。材料与方法:随机选取下颌磨牙40颗,其中第一磨牙20颗,第二磨牙20颗。评估四种水平颊舌距离:CEJ、分叉入口/顶宽(FE)、中根宽(MRW)和远根宽(DRW)。通过分别从MRW、DRW和CEJ中减去FE测量值,确定每个牙齿的FE测量值与MRW、DRW和CEJ之间的差异。结果:第一磨牙分岔口宽度平均为5.41±0.67 mm (4 ~ 7mm),第二磨牙分岔口宽度平均为5.18±0.64 mm (4 ~ 6mm)。在本研究中,FE比近根面和远根面更向内测量,因此,FE比MRW和DRW小。由此可见,实际的分岔宽度远小于CEJ宽度、MRW和DRW。结论:以牙根外表面为参考点的水平探深的临床测量高估了下颌磨牙分叉受累的真实解剖成分。相反,这些牙齿的积极治疗结果可能被低估。因此,在手术干预前估计实际分叉入口宽度是必要的,并且可以影响不同再生治疗分叉缺陷后受损伤牙齿的预后。关键词:分叉治疗,磨牙解剖,牙周附着缺失/诊断,再生治疗效果评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信