A historical perspective on unconfined seepage: correcting a common fallacy

IF 0.4 Q3 Engineering

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering History and Heritage Pub Date : 2019-05-14 DOI:10.1680/JENHH.19.00004

D. WesleyLaurence, PreeneMartin

引用次数: 3

Abstract

It is commonly assumed in seepage studies for geotechnical problems that the phreatic surface (the line of zero pore water pressure) represents the upper flow line and is the boundary of the seepag...

查看原文本刊更多论文

无限渗流的历史透视:纠正一个普遍谬误

在岩土工程问题的渗流研究中，通常认为潜水面(零孔隙水压力线)代表上流线，是渗流的边界。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering History and Heritage ENGINEERING, CIVIL-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

50.00%

发文量