Ex-post impact evaluation of PPP projects from multiple stakeholder perspectives: a toll road case

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Jose Oliveros-Romero, A. Aibinu
{"title":"Ex-post impact evaluation of PPP projects from multiple stakeholder perspectives: a toll road case","authors":"Jose Oliveros-Romero, A. Aibinu","doi":"10.1108/bepam-03-2022-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to develop an ex-post impact evaluation method for public-private partnership projects (PPP) that addresses one of its main difficulties: the multiplicity of perspectives and stakeholders that exist in these projects.Design/methodology/approachThis study first developed a conceptual evaluation framework called ‘Project Success Evaluation Pyramid Model’ (PSEPM) that was designed using a Design Science approach. Second, an impact evaluation method was designed based on the PSEPM. This evaluation method was tested and refined using three PPP projects. This article presents the refined conceptual model PSEPM, the evaluation method and one of the three tests: the PPP toll road.FindingsThe impact evaluation method describes how to evaluate the impact of an existing mega project from the perspective of multiple stakeholders and isolate the impact of the procurement method. Its application in practice is demonstrated with a PPP toll road project in Chile, in which 11 stakeholders were identified. Issues such as city segregation, deficient business model, the relevance of infrastructure availability, and deficient service-fee strategy were identified in the project. The evaluation method provides a judgement about the use of the PPP procurement method and about the overall impact of the project, reconciling the stakeholder perspectives.Originality/valueThe use of this approach could give greater clarity and legitimacy to the discussion over the use of PPPs by evaluating existing projects beyond the use of traditional time and cost measurements. Its originality is the systematic recognition and identification of stakeholder motives, purposes, and judgements over a project.","PeriodicalId":46426,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-03-2022-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to develop an ex-post impact evaluation method for public-private partnership projects (PPP) that addresses one of its main difficulties: the multiplicity of perspectives and stakeholders that exist in these projects.Design/methodology/approachThis study first developed a conceptual evaluation framework called ‘Project Success Evaluation Pyramid Model’ (PSEPM) that was designed using a Design Science approach. Second, an impact evaluation method was designed based on the PSEPM. This evaluation method was tested and refined using three PPP projects. This article presents the refined conceptual model PSEPM, the evaluation method and one of the three tests: the PPP toll road.FindingsThe impact evaluation method describes how to evaluate the impact of an existing mega project from the perspective of multiple stakeholders and isolate the impact of the procurement method. Its application in practice is demonstrated with a PPP toll road project in Chile, in which 11 stakeholders were identified. Issues such as city segregation, deficient business model, the relevance of infrastructure availability, and deficient service-fee strategy were identified in the project. The evaluation method provides a judgement about the use of the PPP procurement method and about the overall impact of the project, reconciling the stakeholder perspectives.Originality/valueThe use of this approach could give greater clarity and legitimacy to the discussion over the use of PPPs by evaluating existing projects beyond the use of traditional time and cost measurements. Its originality is the systematic recognition and identification of stakeholder motives, purposes, and judgements over a project.
多方利益相关者视角下PPP项目的事后影响评价:以收费公路为例
目的本研究旨在为公私合作项目(PPP)制定一种事后影响评估方法,以解决其主要困难之一:这些项目中存在的视角和利益相关者的多样性。设计/方法论/方法本研究首先开发了一个名为“项目成功评估金字塔模型”(PSPM)的概念评估框架,该框架是使用设计科学方法设计的。其次,设计了一种基于PSPM的影响评价方法。该评估方法通过三个PPP项目进行了测试和完善。本文提出了完善的概念模型PSEPM、评估方法和三个测试之一:PPP收费公路。发现影响评估方法描述了如何从多个利益相关者的角度评估现有大型项目的影响,并隔离采购方法的影响。智利的一个PPP收费公路项目证明了它在实践中的应用,该项目确定了11个利益相关者。项目中发现了城市隔离、商业模式不足、基础设施可用性的相关性和服务费策略不足等问题。评估方法对PPP采购方法的使用和项目的整体影响进行了判断,协调了利益相关者的观点。独创性/价值使用这种方法可以通过评估传统时间和成本计量之外的现有项目,使关于购买力平价使用的讨论更加清晰和合法。它的独创性是系统地认识和识别利益相关者对项目的动机、目的和判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信