International experience in Keeping Public Order in Courts: what prospect for implementation under Ukrainian Law?

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
S. Denysyuk, N. Yuzikova, O. Pochanska, I. Volska
{"title":"International experience in Keeping Public Order in Courts: what prospect for implementation under Ukrainian Law?","authors":"S. Denysyuk, N. Yuzikova, O. Pochanska, I. Volska","doi":"10.24862/RCDU.V12I1.1441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article articulates that there is the need to abridge the situation of international experience in protecting and keeping public order in courts and also in ensuring the possibilities of its application in Ukraine. In order for us to have a concrete understanding of this concepts, it has been concluded that there is currently any world practice of the most effective and universal mechanism for ensuring and keeping public order in courts. This activity in most countries is usually entrusted to several services or law enforcement agencies. The experience of protecting and keeping public order in courts has been distinguished, which must be taken into account for the development of the Ukrainian Judicial Protection Service, where close and trusting relations has been established between the law enforcement service in courts and the judges of a particular court; carrying out of the protection of public order should include not only ensuring the court premises with a sufficient number of highly professional security guards, but also its (court) equipment with the necessary technical and electronic devices; the judicial protection service should closely interact with law enforcement agencies of both state and local level, especially in regions with a high crime situation; the implementation of activities to ensure and keep public order in courts should be based on the relevant special conceptual and program documents, should provide specific approaches to risk assessment and forms and methods of responding to them.","PeriodicalId":53730,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Curso de Direito do UNIFOR","volume":"12 1","pages":"180-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Curso de Direito do UNIFOR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24862/RCDU.V12I1.1441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article articulates that there is the need to abridge the situation of international experience in protecting and keeping public order in courts and also in ensuring the possibilities of its application in Ukraine. In order for us to have a concrete understanding of this concepts, it has been concluded that there is currently any world practice of the most effective and universal mechanism for ensuring and keeping public order in courts. This activity in most countries is usually entrusted to several services or law enforcement agencies. The experience of protecting and keeping public order in courts has been distinguished, which must be taken into account for the development of the Ukrainian Judicial Protection Service, where close and trusting relations has been established between the law enforcement service in courts and the judges of a particular court; carrying out of the protection of public order should include not only ensuring the court premises with a sufficient number of highly professional security guards, but also its (court) equipment with the necessary technical and electronic devices; the judicial protection service should closely interact with law enforcement agencies of both state and local level, especially in regions with a high crime situation; the implementation of activities to ensure and keep public order in courts should be based on the relevant special conceptual and program documents, should provide specific approaches to risk assessment and forms and methods of responding to them.
维护法院公共秩序的国际经验:在乌克兰法律下实施的前景如何?
这一条明确指出,有必要总结国际上在保护和维持法院公共秩序以及确保其在乌克兰适用的可能性方面的经验。为了让我们具体了解这些概念,我们得出的结论是,目前世界上存在着确保和维持法院公共秩序的最有效和最普遍的机制。在大多数国家,这项活动通常委托给几个服务部门或执法机构。保护和维持法院公共秩序的经验是与众不同的,在发展乌克兰司法保护局时必须考虑到这一点,在该局,法院执法部门与特定法院的法官之间建立了密切和信任的关系;保护公共秩序不仅应确保法院场所配备足够数量的高度专业的保安,还应确保其(法院)设备配备必要的技术和电子设备;司法保护部门应与州和地方各级执法机构密切互动,特别是在犯罪率高的地区;确保和维护法院公共秩序活动的实施应以相关的专门概念和程序文件为基础,应提供具体的风险评估方法以及应对方式和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信