{"title":"Long Term of Soil Carbon Stock in No-Till System Affected by a Rolling Landscape in Southern Brazil","authors":"E. Thomaz, Julliane P. Kurasz","doi":"10.3390/soilsystems7020060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1960s, a conservationist agricultural practice known as a “no-tillage system” was adopted. Several benefits such as soil erosion reduction and soil carbon sequestration, among others, could be ascribed to no-till systems. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the long-term sustainability of this agricultural system in different environments. This study has the objective to evaluate the soil organic carbon dynamic in a no-till system (40-year) and on a rolling landscape in Southern Brazil. A systematic grid with four transversal–longitudinal transects was used for soil sampling. Soil samples from 0–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm depths were collected (16 trenches × 3 depths × 1 sample per soil layer = 48), and a forest nearby was used as control (4 trenches × 3 depths × 1 sample = 12). The soil at the forest site showed 20% more carbon stock than no-till at the 0–20 cm soil depth. However, the entire no-till soil profile (0–60 cm) showed similar soil carbon as forest soil. The soil carbon stock (0–20 cm) in no-till was depleted at a rate of 0.06 kg C m−2 year−1, summing up to a carbon loss of 2.43 kg C m−2. In addition, the non-uniform hillslope affected the soil carbon redistribution through the landscape, since the convex hillslope was more depleted in carbon by 37% (15.87 kg C m−2) when compared to the concave sector (25.27 kg C m−2). On average, the soil carbon loss in the subtropical agroecosystem was much lower than those reported in literature, as well as our initial expectations. In addition, the no-till system was capable of preserving soil carbon in the deepest soil layers. However, presently, the no-till system is losing more carbon in the topsoil at a rate greater than the soil carbon input.","PeriodicalId":21908,"journal":{"name":"Soil Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems7020060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the 1960s, a conservationist agricultural practice known as a “no-tillage system” was adopted. Several benefits such as soil erosion reduction and soil carbon sequestration, among others, could be ascribed to no-till systems. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the long-term sustainability of this agricultural system in different environments. This study has the objective to evaluate the soil organic carbon dynamic in a no-till system (40-year) and on a rolling landscape in Southern Brazil. A systematic grid with four transversal–longitudinal transects was used for soil sampling. Soil samples from 0–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm depths were collected (16 trenches × 3 depths × 1 sample per soil layer = 48), and a forest nearby was used as control (4 trenches × 3 depths × 1 sample = 12). The soil at the forest site showed 20% more carbon stock than no-till at the 0–20 cm soil depth. However, the entire no-till soil profile (0–60 cm) showed similar soil carbon as forest soil. The soil carbon stock (0–20 cm) in no-till was depleted at a rate of 0.06 kg C m−2 year−1, summing up to a carbon loss of 2.43 kg C m−2. In addition, the non-uniform hillslope affected the soil carbon redistribution through the landscape, since the convex hillslope was more depleted in carbon by 37% (15.87 kg C m−2) when compared to the concave sector (25.27 kg C m−2). On average, the soil carbon loss in the subtropical agroecosystem was much lower than those reported in literature, as well as our initial expectations. In addition, the no-till system was capable of preserving soil carbon in the deepest soil layers. However, presently, the no-till system is losing more carbon in the topsoil at a rate greater than the soil carbon input.
在20世纪60年代,一种被称为“免耕制度”的环保农业实践被采用。诸如减少土壤侵蚀和土壤固碳等若干好处可归因于免耕制度。因此,评估这种农业系统在不同环境下的长期可持续性是很重要的。本研究的目的是评估巴西南部免耕系统(40年)和滚动景观下土壤有机碳动态。土壤取样采用了一个系统的网格,有四个横向-纵向样条。选取深度为0 ~ 20、20 ~ 40、40 ~ 60 cm的土壤样品(16沟× 3深度× 1样/土层= 48),并以附近森林为对照(4沟× 3深度× 1样= 12)。在0 ~ 20 cm土壤深度,森林立地土壤碳储量比免耕土壤高20%。免耕土壤全剖面(0 ~ 60 cm)土壤碳含量与森林土壤相似。免耕土壤(0 ~ 20 cm)碳储量以0.06 kg C m−2年−1的速率消耗,累计碳损失为2.43 kg C m−2。此外,不均匀坡度影响了土壤碳在景观中的再分配,凸坡比凹坡(25.27 kg C m−2)损失了37% (15.87 kg C m−2)。平均而言,亚热带农业生态系统的土壤碳损失远低于文献报道,也低于我们最初的预期。此外,免耕制度能够保持土壤中最深层的土壤碳。然而,目前,免耕制度在表层土壤中以大于土壤碳输入的速度损失更多的碳。