Fiction talk as a reflective practice: Medical students discussing possible learning outcomes from fiction seminars

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anja Rydén Gramner
{"title":"Fiction talk as a reflective practice: Medical students discussing possible learning outcomes from fiction seminars","authors":"Anja Rydén Gramner","doi":"10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In medical education, reflection is widely considered to be an important skill for physicians, and thus an important skill for medical students to learn. There is however no consensus on how reflection should be taught, and empirical research on in-situ reflective practices in medical education is fairly uncommon. This paper uses discursive psychology (DP) as theoretical and methodological framework to uncover how reflection is interactionally achieved in fiction seminars, which are used in medical education as a means to teach professional skills such as reflection and emotional awareness. In the data set of 58 h of video- and audio recordings from fiction seminars in two medical schools, 24 examples were found where students reflect on the possible learning outcomes of discussing fiction. Analysis shows that reflective practices are imbedded in fiction seminars, and that reflection is collectively achieved by students listening to each other, building on each other's reflections and challenging each other's viewpoints. These practices allow students to construct both resistance and learning while still adhering to the aims of the seminars of ‘doing reflection’.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46850,"journal":{"name":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656123000296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In medical education, reflection is widely considered to be an important skill for physicians, and thus an important skill for medical students to learn. There is however no consensus on how reflection should be taught, and empirical research on in-situ reflective practices in medical education is fairly uncommon. This paper uses discursive psychology (DP) as theoretical and methodological framework to uncover how reflection is interactionally achieved in fiction seminars, which are used in medical education as a means to teach professional skills such as reflection and emotional awareness. In the data set of 58 h of video- and audio recordings from fiction seminars in two medical schools, 24 examples were found where students reflect on the possible learning outcomes of discussing fiction. Analysis shows that reflective practices are imbedded in fiction seminars, and that reflection is collectively achieved by students listening to each other, building on each other's reflections and challenging each other's viewpoints. These practices allow students to construct both resistance and learning while still adhering to the aims of the seminars of ‘doing reflection’.

小说谈话作为一种反思性实践:医学生讨论小说研讨会可能产生的学习结果
在医学教育中,反思被广泛认为是医生的一项重要技能,因此也是医学生学习的一项重要技能。然而,对于如何教授反思并没有达成共识,对医学教育中现场反思实践的实证研究也相当罕见。本文使用话语心理学(DP)作为理论和方法框架来揭示反思是如何在小说研讨会中互动实现的,这些研讨会在医学教育中被用作教授反思和情感意识等专业技能的手段。在两所医学院小说研讨会的58小时视频和音频记录的数据集中,发现了24个例子,其中学生反思讨论小说可能带来的学习成果。分析表明,反思性实践嵌入在小说研讨会中,学生们通过相互倾听、以彼此的反思为基础、挑战彼此的观点来集体实现反思。这些实践可以让学生在坚持“做反思”的研讨会目标的同时,既能抵抗又能学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning Culture and Social Interaction
Learning Culture and Social Interaction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信