{"title":"Compensation Funds as a Remedial Mechanism for Victims of Corporate Pollution in Kenya: A Feasibility Study","authors":"Rose Mwanza","doi":"10.1093/jel/eqab017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article explores the potential of a public-run, risk-based compensation fund to provide compensation for victims of corporate pollution in Kenya. Existing remedial mechanisms are severely limited by the uncertainty of recovery attributable to doctrinal barriers in liability rules, the length of time and cost involved in settling claims and the impact of corruption as a hindrance to access to justice. Depending on their design, compensation funds could offer prompt compensation at lower personal costs to claimants. Considering that victims of corporate pollution in Kenya tend to be poor, prompt compensation can cushion their welfare by providing much-needed funds to cover medical expenses and support livelihoods. While claimants would likely obtain less compensation in absolute amounts than in tort litigation, they would still retain the right to pursue supplemental compensation through alternative mechanisms. Thus, a pragmatic approach would be to develop a compensation fund while introducing effective reforms to existing mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":46437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqab017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article explores the potential of a public-run, risk-based compensation fund to provide compensation for victims of corporate pollution in Kenya. Existing remedial mechanisms are severely limited by the uncertainty of recovery attributable to doctrinal barriers in liability rules, the length of time and cost involved in settling claims and the impact of corruption as a hindrance to access to justice. Depending on their design, compensation funds could offer prompt compensation at lower personal costs to claimants. Considering that victims of corporate pollution in Kenya tend to be poor, prompt compensation can cushion their welfare by providing much-needed funds to cover medical expenses and support livelihoods. While claimants would likely obtain less compensation in absolute amounts than in tort litigation, they would still retain the right to pursue supplemental compensation through alternative mechanisms. Thus, a pragmatic approach would be to develop a compensation fund while introducing effective reforms to existing mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
Condensing essential information into just three issues a year, the Journal of Environmental Law has become an authoritative source of informed analysis for all those who have any dealings in this vital field of legal study. It exists primarily for academics and legal practitioners, but should also prove accessible for all other groups concerned with the environment, from scientists to planners. The journal offers major articles on a wide variety of topics, refereed and written to the highest standards, providing innovative and authoritative appraisals of current and emerging concepts, policies, and practice. It includes: -An analysis section, providing detailed analysis of current case law and legislative and policy developments -An annual review of significant UK, European Court of Justice, and international law cases -A substantial book reviews section