Postoperative Health Status and Quality of Life After Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomy for Living Donor Liver Transplantation

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
C. Cho, G. Choi, J. M. Kim, J. Rhu, C. Kwon, J. Joh
{"title":"Postoperative Health Status and Quality of Life After Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomy for Living Donor Liver Transplantation","authors":"C. Cho, G. Choi, J. M. Kim, J. Rhu, C. Kwon, J. Joh","doi":"10.12659/AOT.935611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (LDH) for living donor liver transplantation has been performed in several specialized institutes. Surgical outcomes of LDH have shown comparable results to open donor hepatectomy (ODH), but the quality of life (QOL) after LDH is not known. This prospective questionnaire-based study was performed to assess health status and QOL of live liver donors before and after donor hepatectomy (DH). Material/Methods From May 2017 to February 2020, questionnaire items such as the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery mobility scale (EMS), Body Image Questionnaire, and EQ-5D-3L were examined up to 1 year after DH to respectively evaluate postoperative recovery, body image satisfaction, and health status. Results During the study period, 45 laparoscopic DH (LDH) donors and 2 open DH (ODH) donors were finally fully evaluated. The LDH group had a significantly higher mean EMS than ODH on postoperative day (POD) 5, and 7 (P=0.011, and P=0.004, respectively). Body image scores of the LDH group were significantly higher than that of the ODH group at 1 month after DH (17.8 vs 15.0, P=0.017). There were 45 LDH donors who recovered to preoperative values at 6 months and 1 month after DH, with no statistically significant difference in EQ-5D-3L index value and visual analogue scale (P=0.059 and P=0.217, respectively). Conclusions Within 1 month after DH, LDH donors showed faster mobility recovery and body image satisfaction to the level of preoperative status than ODH. LDH donors recovered to preoperative health status within 6 months, in accordance with previous studies of ODH donors.","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"27 1","pages":"e935611-1 - e935611-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.935611","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (LDH) for living donor liver transplantation has been performed in several specialized institutes. Surgical outcomes of LDH have shown comparable results to open donor hepatectomy (ODH), but the quality of life (QOL) after LDH is not known. This prospective questionnaire-based study was performed to assess health status and QOL of live liver donors before and after donor hepatectomy (DH). Material/Methods From May 2017 to February 2020, questionnaire items such as the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery mobility scale (EMS), Body Image Questionnaire, and EQ-5D-3L were examined up to 1 year after DH to respectively evaluate postoperative recovery, body image satisfaction, and health status. Results During the study period, 45 laparoscopic DH (LDH) donors and 2 open DH (ODH) donors were finally fully evaluated. The LDH group had a significantly higher mean EMS than ODH on postoperative day (POD) 5, and 7 (P=0.011, and P=0.004, respectively). Body image scores of the LDH group were significantly higher than that of the ODH group at 1 month after DH (17.8 vs 15.0, P=0.017). There were 45 LDH donors who recovered to preoperative values at 6 months and 1 month after DH, with no statistically significant difference in EQ-5D-3L index value and visual analogue scale (P=0.059 and P=0.217, respectively). Conclusions Within 1 month after DH, LDH donors showed faster mobility recovery and body image satisfaction to the level of preoperative status than ODH. LDH donors recovered to preoperative health status within 6 months, in accordance with previous studies of ODH donors.
活体肝移植纯腹腔镜供肝切除术后健康状况与生活质量
背景腹腔镜供肝切除术(LDH)用于活体肝移植已在一些专业机构进行。LDH的手术结果已经显示出与开放式供肝切除术(ODH)相当的结果,但LDH后的生活质量(QOL)尚不清楚。本前瞻性研究以问卷为基础,评估活体肝供者在供肝切除术(DH)前后的健康状况和生活质量。材料/方法于2017年5月至2020年2月期间,对术后1年的增强术后恢复活动能力量表(EMS)、身体形象问卷(Body Image questionnaire)和EQ-5D-3L进行问卷调查,分别评估术后恢复情况、身体形象满意度和健康状况。结果在研究期间,对45例腹腔镜DH (LDH)供体和2例开放式DH (ODH)供体进行了全面评估。LDH组术后第5、7天平均EMS显著高于ODH组(P=0.011、P=0.004)。LDH组身体形象评分在DH后1个月显著高于ODH组(17.8 vs 15.0, P=0.017)。有45例LDH供体在DH后6个月和1个月恢复到术前值,EQ-5D-3L指数值和视觉模拟评分差异无统计学意义(P=0.059和P=0.217)。结论DH后1个月内,LDH供者的活动能力恢复速度和身体形象满意度均高于ODH。根据以往对脱氢酶供者的研究,脱氢酶供者在6个月内恢复到术前健康状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation. Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time to first decision is around 3-4 weeks. Time to publication of accepted manuscripts continues to be shortened, with the Editorial team committed to a goal of 3 months from acceptance to publication. Expert reseachers and clinicians from around the world contribute original Articles, Review Papers, Case Reports and Special Reports in every pertinent specialty, providing a lot of arguments for discussion of exciting developments and controversies in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信