Profiling Citizens in the Smart City: A Quantitative Study in Wallonia

IF 7 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Clémentine Schelings, Aurore Defays, C. Elsen
{"title":"Profiling Citizens in the Smart City: A Quantitative Study in Wallonia","authors":"Clémentine Schelings, Aurore Defays, C. Elsen","doi":"10.3390/smartcities6040098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the assumption that citizens can participate in smart city development, this paper aims to capture the diversity of their profiles and their positioning towards smart city dynamics. The article starts with a literature review of some models of citizens to better understand how they could be portrayed in the smart city era. Considering that there is no “general citizen” and that usual typologies remain restrictive, we construct tailor-made personas, i.e., fictitious profiles based on real data. To this end, we present the results of a large-scale survey distributed to highly educated Walloon people in the framework of a general public exhibition. The profiling focuses on three aspects: (1) perception of smart city dimensions, (2) intended behavior regarding smart city solutions, and (3) favorite participatory methods. The collected answers were first analyzed with descriptive and nonparametric statistics, then classified with a k-means cluster analysis. The main results are five personas, which highlight the coexistence of different citizen groups that think and behave in a specific way. This process of profiling citizens’ priorities, behaviors, and participatory preferences can help professional designers and local governments to consider various citizens’ perspectives in the design of future smart solutions and participatory processes.","PeriodicalId":34482,"journal":{"name":"Smart Cities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6040098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the assumption that citizens can participate in smart city development, this paper aims to capture the diversity of their profiles and their positioning towards smart city dynamics. The article starts with a literature review of some models of citizens to better understand how they could be portrayed in the smart city era. Considering that there is no “general citizen” and that usual typologies remain restrictive, we construct tailor-made personas, i.e., fictitious profiles based on real data. To this end, we present the results of a large-scale survey distributed to highly educated Walloon people in the framework of a general public exhibition. The profiling focuses on three aspects: (1) perception of smart city dimensions, (2) intended behavior regarding smart city solutions, and (3) favorite participatory methods. The collected answers were first analyzed with descriptive and nonparametric statistics, then classified with a k-means cluster analysis. The main results are five personas, which highlight the coexistence of different citizen groups that think and behave in a specific way. This process of profiling citizens’ priorities, behaviors, and participatory preferences can help professional designers and local governments to consider various citizens’ perspectives in the design of future smart solutions and participatory processes.
智能城市中的市民画像:瓦隆尼亚的定量研究
基于公民可以参与智慧城市发展的假设,本文旨在捕捉他们的个人资料的多样性及其对智慧城市动态的定位。本文首先对一些公民模型进行了文献综述,以更好地了解在智能城市时代如何塑造他们。考虑到没有“普通公民”,而且通常的类型仍然受到限制,我们构建了量身定制的人物角色,即基于真实数据的虚构档案。为此,我们在一个公众展览的框架内,向受过高等教育的瓦隆人发布了一项大规模调查的结果。分析集中在三个方面:(1)对智能城市维度的感知,(2)关于智能城市解决方案的预期行为,以及(3)最喜欢的参与方法。收集到的答案首先用描述性和非参数统计学进行分析,然后用k均值聚类分析进行分类。主要结果是五个人物角色,突出了以特定方式思考和行为的不同公民群体的共存。这种分析公民优先事项、行为和参与偏好的过程可以帮助专业设计师和地方政府在设计未来的智能解决方案和参与过程时考虑各种公民的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Smart Cities
Smart Cities Multiple-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Smart Cities (ISSN 2624-6511) provides an advanced forum for the dissemination of information on the science and technology of smart cities, publishing reviews, regular research papers (articles) and communications in all areas of research concerning smart cities. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible, with no restriction on the maximum length of the papers published so that all experimental results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信