Substantive Representation of Women in Asian Parliaments. Edited by Devin K. Joshi and Christian Echle. London: Routledge, 2022. 294 pp. $128.00 (cloth), $44.95 (paper). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003275961.

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
S. Palmieri
{"title":"Substantive Representation of Women in Asian Parliaments. Edited by Devin K. Joshi and Christian Echle. London: Routledge, 2022. 294 pp. $128.00 (cloth), $44.95 (paper). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003275961.","authors":"S. Palmieri","doi":"10.1017/S1743923X22000332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a discipline, we know very little about the experience of women in parliaments across Asia, even though the region is home to “three-fifths of the world’s population” (1) and the world’s first female prime minister (Sirimavo Bandaranaike, Sri Lanka, 1960). In part, thismay be because—in the aggregate—women’s political presence in this region has tended to sit “in the middle” of global rankings: not high enough to warrant “best practice” accounts, yet not low enough to become a focal point of development concern. Our limited collective understanding, however, may also reflect the Euro-American focus of our discipline, which has historically set the standard of what counts as “good research.” Academics who sit and write outside these theoretical frameworks and interpretative lens have been rendered less visible. Devin K. Joshi and Christian Echle’s edited collection, Substantive Representation of Women in Asian Parliaments, therefore represents a significant contribution to our understanding of women’s experiences across 10 very diverse parliaments: Japan, South Korea and Taiwan (in East Asia); Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Timor-Leste (in Southeast Asia); and Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka (in South Asia). Mikiko Eto and Ummu Atiyah Ahmad Zakuan, writing on Japan andMalaysia, respectively, explicitly refer to their studies as the “first” on the substantive representation of women (SRW) in those countries (28, 121), although this would also be the case for a number of other chapters. The collection begins with Joshi’s description of the Asian context, defined in terms of its widespread “patriarchal bureaucratization of power,” which has accounted for “women’s formal exclusion from political institutions,” and the high number of states that can still be classified as “non-democracies, semidemocracies, and newly emerging democracies” (6). Each chapter then follows a similar structure, beginning with a discussion of political and cultural contexts, including legislative and policy efforts to advance gender equality more broadly, followed by descriptions of the individuals surveyed for the study. These are","PeriodicalId":47464,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Gender","volume":"19 1","pages":"648 - 650"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Gender","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X22000332","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a discipline, we know very little about the experience of women in parliaments across Asia, even though the region is home to “three-fifths of the world’s population” (1) and the world’s first female prime minister (Sirimavo Bandaranaike, Sri Lanka, 1960). In part, thismay be because—in the aggregate—women’s political presence in this region has tended to sit “in the middle” of global rankings: not high enough to warrant “best practice” accounts, yet not low enough to become a focal point of development concern. Our limited collective understanding, however, may also reflect the Euro-American focus of our discipline, which has historically set the standard of what counts as “good research.” Academics who sit and write outside these theoretical frameworks and interpretative lens have been rendered less visible. Devin K. Joshi and Christian Echle’s edited collection, Substantive Representation of Women in Asian Parliaments, therefore represents a significant contribution to our understanding of women’s experiences across 10 very diverse parliaments: Japan, South Korea and Taiwan (in East Asia); Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Timor-Leste (in Southeast Asia); and Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka (in South Asia). Mikiko Eto and Ummu Atiyah Ahmad Zakuan, writing on Japan andMalaysia, respectively, explicitly refer to their studies as the “first” on the substantive representation of women (SRW) in those countries (28, 121), although this would also be the case for a number of other chapters. The collection begins with Joshi’s description of the Asian context, defined in terms of its widespread “patriarchal bureaucratization of power,” which has accounted for “women’s formal exclusion from political institutions,” and the high number of states that can still be classified as “non-democracies, semidemocracies, and newly emerging democracies” (6). Each chapter then follows a similar structure, beginning with a discussion of political and cultural contexts, including legislative and policy efforts to advance gender equality more broadly, followed by descriptions of the individuals surveyed for the study. These are
妇女在亚洲议会中的实质性代表。由Devin K.Joshi和Christian Echle编辑。伦敦:劳特利奇,2022年。294页128.00美元(布),44.95美元(纸)。https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003275961.
作为一门学科,我们对亚洲各国议会中女性的经历知之甚少,尽管该地区拥有“世界五分之三的人口”(1)和世界上第一位女总理(斯里兰卡Sirimavo Bandaranaike,1960年)。在某种程度上,这可能是因为在总体上,妇女在该地区的政治地位往往在全球排名中处于“中间”:不高到足以保证“最佳实践”账户,但也不低到足以成为发展关注的焦点。然而,我们有限的集体理解也可能反映出我们学科的欧美焦点,该学科在历史上设定了什么是“好的研究”的标准。那些坐在这些理论框架和解释镜头之外写作的学者变得不那么显眼了。因此,Devin K.Joshi和Christian Echle编辑的合集《妇女在亚洲议会中的实质性代表》对我们理解10个不同议会的妇女经历做出了重大贡献:日本、韩国和台湾(东亚);印度尼西亚、马来西亚、菲律宾和东帝汶(在东南亚);孟加拉国、尼泊尔和斯里兰卡(南亚)。Mikiko Eto和Ummu Atiyah Ahmad Zakuan分别在关于日本和马来西亚的文章中明确表示,他们的研究是关于这些国家妇女实质性代表性的“第一次”研究(28121),尽管其他一些章节也是如此。该系列以乔希对亚洲背景的描述开始,根据其广泛的“父权制权力官僚化”来定义,这解释了“女性被正式排斥在政治机构之外”,以及仍有大量国家可以被归类为“非民主国家、半民主国家和新兴民主国家”(6)。然后,每一章都遵循类似的结构,首先讨论政治和文化背景,包括更广泛地促进性别平等的立法和政策努力,然后描述为研究而接受调查的个人。这些是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Politics & Gender
Politics & Gender Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Politics & Gender is an agenda-setting journal that publishes the highest quality scholarship on gender and politics and on women and politics. It aims to represent the full range of questions, issues, and approaches on gender and women across the major subfields of political science, including comparative politics, international relations, political theory, and U.S. politics. The Editor welcomes studies that address fundamental questions in politics and political science from the perspective of gender difference, as well as those that interrogate and challenge standard analytical categories and conventional methodologies.Members of the Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信