Implementation of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in small animal practice following an intensive training course

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES
S. Enciso, I. Díaz-Güemes, B. Fernández-Tomé, Belén Moreno-Naranjo, M. A. Sánchez-Hurtado, L. Correa-Martín, Javier Sánchez-Fernández, E. Pérez-Merino, Jesús M Usón-Casaús, F. Sánchez-Margallo
{"title":"Implementation of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in small animal practice following an intensive training course","authors":"S. Enciso, I. Díaz-Güemes, B. Fernández-Tomé, Belén Moreno-Naranjo, M. A. Sánchez-Hurtado, L. Correa-Martín, Javier Sánchez-Fernández, E. Pérez-Merino, Jesús M Usón-Casaús, F. Sánchez-Margallo","doi":"10.22201/fmvz.24486760e.2020.2.857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to assess trainee perceptions regarding the usefulness of an intensive hands-on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) training, as well as the subsequent implementation experience. An online questionnaire was emailed to 110 small animal veterinarians who attended the course between 2007 and 2017. The questionnaire comprised three sections: general attendee information, questions pertaining to the received laparoscopic and thoracoscopic training, and finally enquiries on cumulative post-training and current MIS practice. Forty-five veterinarians answered the questionnaire. Most respondents had prior laparoscopy and/or thoracoscopy experience (95.2 %), but close to half (46.7 %), modified their clinical practice as a result of the training. Seventy-five percent of the totally inexperienced participants started practicing MIS within two years of attending the course. A large proportion of respondents indicated their need for additional training for more advanced laparoscopy (71.1%) and thoracoscopy (77.8%) procedures. Accordingly, the main difficulty found by respondents regarding MIS implementation was insufficient training (37.8%). The most frequently encountered difficulty during procedures was bleeding (46.7%), while the most feared complication was related to anesthesia (31.1%). Ovariectomy and ovariohysterectomy were the most frequently performed minimally invasive procedures in trainee working centers. MIS training promotes the introduction of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy into clinical practice and expands the type of surgeries performed with these approaches. Nonetheless, a single intensive program does not comply with the diverse training needs of small animal practitioners.","PeriodicalId":56044,"journal":{"name":"Veterinaria Mexico","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinaria Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/fmvz.24486760e.2020.2.857","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess trainee perceptions regarding the usefulness of an intensive hands-on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) training, as well as the subsequent implementation experience. An online questionnaire was emailed to 110 small animal veterinarians who attended the course between 2007 and 2017. The questionnaire comprised three sections: general attendee information, questions pertaining to the received laparoscopic and thoracoscopic training, and finally enquiries on cumulative post-training and current MIS practice. Forty-five veterinarians answered the questionnaire. Most respondents had prior laparoscopy and/or thoracoscopy experience (95.2 %), but close to half (46.7 %), modified their clinical practice as a result of the training. Seventy-five percent of the totally inexperienced participants started practicing MIS within two years of attending the course. A large proportion of respondents indicated their need for additional training for more advanced laparoscopy (71.1%) and thoracoscopy (77.8%) procedures. Accordingly, the main difficulty found by respondents regarding MIS implementation was insufficient training (37.8%). The most frequently encountered difficulty during procedures was bleeding (46.7%), while the most feared complication was related to anesthesia (31.1%). Ovariectomy and ovariohysterectomy were the most frequently performed minimally invasive procedures in trainee working centers. MIS training promotes the introduction of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy into clinical practice and expands the type of surgeries performed with these approaches. Nonetheless, a single intensive program does not comply with the diverse training needs of small animal practitioners.
实施腹腔镜和胸腔镜在小动物实践后强化训练课程
本研究旨在评估受训者对强化动手微创手术(MIS)培训的有用性的看法,以及随后的实施经验。通过电子邮件向2007年至2017年间参加该课程的110名小动物兽医发送了一份在线问卷。问卷包括三个部分:一般参与者信息,与接受腹腔镜和胸腔镜训练有关的问题,最后询问累积的训练后和当前的MIS实践。四十五名兽医回答了调查问卷。大多数受访者有腹腔镜检查和/或胸腔镜检查经验(95.2%),但近一半(46.7%)的受访者因培训而改变了他们的临床实践。75%的完全没有经验的参与者在参加课程的两年内开始练习MIS。很大一部分受访者表示,他们需要接受更先进的腹腔镜检查(71.1%)和胸腔镜检查(77.8%)程序的额外培训。因此,受访者发现MIS实施的主要困难是培训不足(37.8%)。手术过程中最常见的困难是出血(46.7%),而最担心的并发症与麻醉有关(31.1%)。在实习工作中心,卵巢切除术和卵巢子宫切除术是最常进行的微创手术。MIS培训促进了腹腔镜和胸腔镜在临床实践中的应用,并扩大了使用这些方法进行的手术类型。尽管如此,单一的强化计划并不符合小型动物从业者的多样化培训需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinaria Mexico
Veterinaria Mexico Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Veterinaria México OA (ISSN 2448-6760) is an online scientific journal edited by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). The journal is Open Access and follows UNAM''s initiative, to transmit knowledge free of charge to the readership and authors, with no Article Processing Charges. This journal publishes advances in Veterinary Sciences and Animal Production, and to reach more lectures across the world the journal was updated since 2014 from its predecessor printed in paper Veterinaria México (ISSN 0301-5092) and its digital version (ISSN 2007-5472).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书