The Meta-Analytic Rain Cloud Plot: A New Approach to Visualizing Clearinghouse Data

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kaitlyn G. Fitzgerald, Elizabeth Tipton
{"title":"The Meta-Analytic Rain Cloud Plot: A New Approach to Visualizing Clearinghouse Data","authors":"Kaitlyn G. Fitzgerald, Elizabeth Tipton","doi":"10.1080/19345747.2022.2031366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As the body of scientific evidence about effective policies and practices grows, so does the need to effectively communicate that evidence to policy-makers and practitioners. Clearinghouses have emerged to facilitate the evidence-based decision-making process for education practitioners. While the results and methods for developing and analyzing the data in clearinghouses are based upon rigorous and scientific study, there has been little rigor or empirical effort to determine effective ways of presenting that evidence to practitioners. In this paper, we present a new visualization for clearinghouse data, called a Meta-Analytic Rain Cloud (MARC) Plot, designed based on evidence from the data visualization and statistical cognition literatures. We evaluate the efficacy of this visualization in a statistical cognition experiment and find that compared to three other visualizations used in practice, the MARC Plot is more effective in helping participants correctly interpret evidence (0.76, 0.43, and 0.43 standard deviation improvements respectively; each p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons). To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies providing evidence regarding how to best present the type of information found in clearinghouses.","PeriodicalId":47260,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness","volume":"15 1","pages":"848 - 875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2022.2031366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract As the body of scientific evidence about effective policies and practices grows, so does the need to effectively communicate that evidence to policy-makers and practitioners. Clearinghouses have emerged to facilitate the evidence-based decision-making process for education practitioners. While the results and methods for developing and analyzing the data in clearinghouses are based upon rigorous and scientific study, there has been little rigor or empirical effort to determine effective ways of presenting that evidence to practitioners. In this paper, we present a new visualization for clearinghouse data, called a Meta-Analytic Rain Cloud (MARC) Plot, designed based on evidence from the data visualization and statistical cognition literatures. We evaluate the efficacy of this visualization in a statistical cognition experiment and find that compared to three other visualizations used in practice, the MARC Plot is more effective in helping participants correctly interpret evidence (0.76, 0.43, and 0.43 standard deviation improvements respectively; each p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons). To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies providing evidence regarding how to best present the type of information found in clearinghouses.
元分析雨云图:一种可视化交换所数据的新方法
随着有关有效政策和实践的科学证据越来越多,向政策制定者和实践者有效传达这些证据的必要性也在增加。信息交换中心的出现是为了促进教育从业者基于证据的决策过程。虽然开发和分析票据交换所数据的结果和方法是基于严格和科学的研究,但很少有严格或经验的努力来确定向从业者提供证据的有效方法。本文在数据可视化和统计认知文献的基础上,提出了一种新的数据可视化方法,称为元分析雨云(MARC)图。我们在统计认知实验中评估了这种可视化的效果,发现与实践中使用的其他三种可视化相比,MARC图在帮助参与者正确解释证据方面更有效(分别提高0.76、0.43和0.43个标准差);p < 0.05,经多次比较校正)。据我们所知,这是第一批提供证据的关于如何最好地呈现在票据交换所中发现的信息类型的研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: As the flagship publication for the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, the Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness (JREE) publishes original articles from the multidisciplinary community of researchers who are committed to applying principles of scientific inquiry to the study of educational problems. Articles published in JREE should advance our knowledge of factors important for educational success and/or improve our ability to conduct further disciplined studies of pressing educational problems. JREE welcomes manuscripts that fit into one of the following categories: (1) intervention, evaluation, and policy studies; (2) theory, contexts, and mechanisms; and (3) methodological studies. The first category includes studies that focus on process and implementation and seek to demonstrate causal claims in educational research. The second category includes meta-analyses and syntheses, descriptive studies that illuminate educational conditions and contexts, and studies that rigorously investigate education processes and mechanism. The third category includes studies that advance our understanding of theoretical and technical features of measurement and research design and describe advances in data analysis and data modeling. To establish a stronger connection between scientific evidence and educational practice, studies submitted to JREE should focus on pressing problems found in classrooms and schools. Studies that help advance our understanding and demonstrate effectiveness related to challenges in reading, mathematics education, and science education are especially welcome as are studies related to cognitive functions, social processes, organizational factors, and cultural features that mediate and/or moderate critical educational outcomes. On occasion, invited responses to JREE articles and rejoinders to those responses will be included in an issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信