The Scientific Rigor of the Objective Structured Examination for Competency Assessment in Health Sciences Education: A Systematic Review

Lucie Pelland, Klodiana Kolomitro, D. Hopkins-Rosseel, Paola Durando
{"title":"The Scientific Rigor of the Objective Structured Examination for Competency Assessment in Health Sciences Education: A Systematic Review","authors":"Lucie Pelland, Klodiana Kolomitro, D. Hopkins-Rosseel, Paola Durando","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background and Purpose. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is widely used as an assessment of competency in health sciences education. The aim of our systematic review was to appraise the scientific rigor of the OSCE as a competency-based assessment in health sciences education, including physical therapy. Methods. Our search was performed in 6 databases—Ovid MEDLINE(R), CINAHL, EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, ERIC, and Web of Science—to identify original data evaluating the OSCE in programs of education in physical therapy and related health sciences disciplines. Data were extracted as per the Utility Model to evaluate the validity, educational impact, reliability, acceptability, and costs of the OSCE in these programs. Results. The search identified 106 records, with 13 studies meeting our eligibility criteria. The OSCE is distinct from traditional clinical assessments, with low-to-fair concurrent validity between the 2 assessment types. The OSCE was used for instructional design, namely, curriculum development and alignment, and for educational practice, namely, making decisions on students' readiness for practice. Limitations of the OSCE include poor-to-low validity to predict practice readiness and low-to-acceptable reliability, with student-specific, domain-specific, and examiner-specific effects on outcomes identified. Strategies were provided which could improve the scientific rigor of the OSCE. Discussion and Conclusion. Based on current evidence, the scientific rigor of the OSCE may be insufficient to support its use to make academic decisions on students' standing in health sciences programs, including physical therapy, and readiness for clinical practice, with confidence. However, the OSCE can play an important role in instructional design and in guiding student learning. Protocol registration: PROSPERO, ID 162338.","PeriodicalId":91351,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":"36 1","pages":"322 - 333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background and Purpose. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is widely used as an assessment of competency in health sciences education. The aim of our systematic review was to appraise the scientific rigor of the OSCE as a competency-based assessment in health sciences education, including physical therapy. Methods. Our search was performed in 6 databases—Ovid MEDLINE(R), CINAHL, EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, ERIC, and Web of Science—to identify original data evaluating the OSCE in programs of education in physical therapy and related health sciences disciplines. Data were extracted as per the Utility Model to evaluate the validity, educational impact, reliability, acceptability, and costs of the OSCE in these programs. Results. The search identified 106 records, with 13 studies meeting our eligibility criteria. The OSCE is distinct from traditional clinical assessments, with low-to-fair concurrent validity between the 2 assessment types. The OSCE was used for instructional design, namely, curriculum development and alignment, and for educational practice, namely, making decisions on students' readiness for practice. Limitations of the OSCE include poor-to-low validity to predict practice readiness and low-to-acceptable reliability, with student-specific, domain-specific, and examiner-specific effects on outcomes identified. Strategies were provided which could improve the scientific rigor of the OSCE. Discussion and Conclusion. Based on current evidence, the scientific rigor of the OSCE may be insufficient to support its use to make academic decisions on students' standing in health sciences programs, including physical therapy, and readiness for clinical practice, with confidence. However, the OSCE can play an important role in instructional design and in guiding student learning. Protocol registration: PROSPERO, ID 162338.
健康科学教育能力评估客观结构化考试的科学严谨性:系统综述
补充数字内容可在文本中获得。背景和目的。客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)被广泛用于健康科学教育能力的评估。我们系统评价的目的是评价欧安组织在健康科学教育(包括物理治疗)方面作为基于能力的评估的科学严谨性。方法。我们在6个数据库(ovid MEDLINE(R)、CINAHL、EMBASE、APA PsycINFO、ERIC和Web of science)中进行检索,以确定评估OSCE在物理治疗和相关健康科学学科教育计划中的原始数据。根据本实用新型提取数据,以评估欧安组织在这些项目中的有效性、教育影响、可靠性、可接受性和成本。结果。检索确定了106项记录,其中13项研究符合我们的资格标准。欧安组织不同于传统的临床评估,在两种评估类型之间具有低至公平的并发效度。OSCE被用于教学设计,即课程开发和校准,以及教育实践,即对学生的实践准备做出决定。OSCE的局限性包括预测实践准备程度的低效度和低可接受的可靠性,以及对结果确定的学生特定、领域特定和考官特定的影响。提出了可以提高欧安组织科学严谨性的战略。讨论与结论。根据目前的证据,欧安组织的科学严谨性可能不足以支持其用于对学生在健康科学项目中的地位做出学术决定,包括物理治疗,以及对临床实践的准备。然而,欧安组织可以在教学设计和指导学生学习方面发挥重要作用。协议注册:普洛斯彼罗,ID 162338。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信