Deep-C storage: Biological, chemical and physical strategies to enhance carbon stocks in agricultural subsoils

IF 10.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Erik S. Button , Jennifer Pett-Ridge , Daniel V. Murphy , Yakov Kuzyakov , David R. Chadwick , Davey L. Jones
{"title":"Deep-C storage: Biological, chemical and physical strategies to enhance carbon stocks in agricultural subsoils","authors":"Erik S. Button ,&nbsp;Jennifer Pett-Ridge ,&nbsp;Daniel V. Murphy ,&nbsp;Yakov Kuzyakov ,&nbsp;David R. Chadwick ,&nbsp;Davey L. Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Due to their substantial volume, subsoils contain more of the total soil carbon (C) pool than topsoils. Much of this C is thousands of years old, suggesting that subsoils offer considerable potential for long-term C sequestration. However, knowledge of subsoil C behaviour and manageability remains incomplete, and subsoil C storage potential has yet to be realised at a large scale, particularly in agricultural systems. A range of biological (e.g. deep-rooting), chemical (e.g. biochar burial) and physical (e.g. deep ploughing) C sequestration strategies have been proposed, but are yet to be assessed. In this review, we identify the main factors that regulate subsoil C cycling and critically evaluate the evidence and mechanistic basis of subsoil strategies designed to promote greater C storage, with particular emphasis on agroecosystems. We assess the barriers and opportunities for the implementation of strategies to enhance subsoil C sequestration and identify 5 key current gaps in scientific understanding. We conclude that subsoils, while highly heterogeneous, are in many cases more suited to long-term C sequestration than topsoils. The proposed strategies may also bring other tangible benefits to cropping systems (e.g. enhanced water holding capacity and nutrient use efficiency). Furthermore, while the subsoil C sequestration strategies we reviewed have large potential, more long-term studies are needed across a diverse range of soils and climates, in conjunction with chronosequence and space-for-time substitutions. Also, it is vital that subsoils are more consistently included in modelled estimations of soil C stocks and C sequestration potential, and that subsoil-explicit C models are developed to specifically reflect subsoil processes. Finally, further mapping of subsoil C is needed in specific regions (e.g. in the Middle East, Eastern Europe, South and Central America, South Asia and Africa). Conducting both immediate and long-term subsoil C studies will fill the knowledge gaps to devise appropriate soil C sequestration strategies and policies to help in the global fight against climate change and decline in soil quality. In conclusion, our evidence-based analysis reveals that subsoils offer an untapped potential to enhance global C storage in terrestrial ecosystems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 108697"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071722001547/pdfft?md5=e9bc29522797c73826081f5b00be8ee0&pid=1-s2.0-S0038071722001547-main.pdf","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071722001547","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Due to their substantial volume, subsoils contain more of the total soil carbon (C) pool than topsoils. Much of this C is thousands of years old, suggesting that subsoils offer considerable potential for long-term C sequestration. However, knowledge of subsoil C behaviour and manageability remains incomplete, and subsoil C storage potential has yet to be realised at a large scale, particularly in agricultural systems. A range of biological (e.g. deep-rooting), chemical (e.g. biochar burial) and physical (e.g. deep ploughing) C sequestration strategies have been proposed, but are yet to be assessed. In this review, we identify the main factors that regulate subsoil C cycling and critically evaluate the evidence and mechanistic basis of subsoil strategies designed to promote greater C storage, with particular emphasis on agroecosystems. We assess the barriers and opportunities for the implementation of strategies to enhance subsoil C sequestration and identify 5 key current gaps in scientific understanding. We conclude that subsoils, while highly heterogeneous, are in many cases more suited to long-term C sequestration than topsoils. The proposed strategies may also bring other tangible benefits to cropping systems (e.g. enhanced water holding capacity and nutrient use efficiency). Furthermore, while the subsoil C sequestration strategies we reviewed have large potential, more long-term studies are needed across a diverse range of soils and climates, in conjunction with chronosequence and space-for-time substitutions. Also, it is vital that subsoils are more consistently included in modelled estimations of soil C stocks and C sequestration potential, and that subsoil-explicit C models are developed to specifically reflect subsoil processes. Finally, further mapping of subsoil C is needed in specific regions (e.g. in the Middle East, Eastern Europe, South and Central America, South Asia and Africa). Conducting both immediate and long-term subsoil C studies will fill the knowledge gaps to devise appropriate soil C sequestration strategies and policies to help in the global fight against climate change and decline in soil quality. In conclusion, our evidence-based analysis reveals that subsoils offer an untapped potential to enhance global C storage in terrestrial ecosystems.

深层碳储存:提高农业底土碳储量的生物、化学和物理策略
由于其巨大的体积,下层土壤比表层土壤含有更多的总土壤碳(C)库。其中大部分碳已经存在了数千年,这表明地下土壤具有相当大的长期碳封存潜力。然而,关于底土C的行为和可管理性的知识仍然不完整,底土C的储存潜力尚未大规模实现,特别是在农业系统中。已经提出了一系列生物(如深根)、化学(如生物炭掩埋)和物理(如深耕)碳封存策略,但尚未进行评估。在这篇综述中,我们确定了调节地下土壤碳循环的主要因素,并批判性地评估了旨在促进更多碳储存的地下土壤策略的证据和机制基础,特别强调了农业生态系统。我们评估了实施加强地下碳封存战略的障碍和机会,并确定了目前科学认识中的5个关键差距。我们的结论是,虽然底土具有高度的异质性,但在许多情况下,底土比表层土更适合长期固碳。拟议的战略还可能给种植系统带来其他切实的好处(例如,提高持水能力和养分利用效率)。此外,虽然我们回顾的地下碳封存策略具有很大的潜力,但需要在不同的土壤和气候范围内进行更长期的研究,并结合时间顺序和空间-时间替代。此外,至关重要的是,在土壤碳储量和碳固存潜力的模型估计中更一致地包括底土,并且开发出明确的底土碳模型来具体反映底土过程。最后,需要在特定区域(如中东、东欧、南美和中美洲、南亚和非洲)进一步绘制底土C。开展近期和长期的底土碳研究将填补知识空白,从而制定适当的土壤碳封存战略和政策,帮助全球应对气候变化和土壤质量下降。总之,基于证据的分析表明,底土在增强陆地生态系统全球碳储量方面具有未开发的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信