Effects of Prairie Degradation and Restoration on Box Turtle Thermal Ecology

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q3 ZOOLOGY
Gabriel L. Yerdon, Ethan J. Royal, C. Kross, J. Willson
{"title":"Effects of Prairie Degradation and Restoration on Box Turtle Thermal Ecology","authors":"Gabriel L. Yerdon, Ethan J. Royal, C. Kross, J. Willson","doi":"10.1670/22-016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Prairie habitat loss in the United States has led to population declines in many prairie-associated species, including Ornate Box Turtles (Terrapene ornata). Northwest Arkansas is an intergrade zone between the prairie-dwelling T. ornata and the more forest-associated Three-Toed Box Turtle (Terrapene carolina). As such, limited information exists on the potential differences in physiology and thermal ecology between the two box turtle species and how those differences might influence their habitat use. We addressed gaps in our knowledge of the thermal and spatial ecology of T. ornata and T. carolina with a three-part study. First, we compared the thermal profiles of refugia, open, and vegetated microhabitats across degraded prairie, restored prairie, and adjacent forest macrohabitats using operative temperature models and a linear mixed effect model. Second, we measured total evaporative water loss of both species across a range of body sizes. Finally, we fitted a subset of turtles with iButton data loggers and monitored them in the field to examine carapace temperatures and habitat use. Operative temperature models recorded high, largely homogeneous temperatures across microhabitats in degraded prairie and heterogeneous temperatures across restored prairie microhabitats, while forest habitat maintained stable, cool temperatures. Both species exhibited similar evaporative water loss rates; however, T. ornata experienced a broader range of temperatures in the field. Terrapene ornata were exclusively found in prairie habitat, whereas T. carolina was often found in forested habitats and subsurface refugia. Our results demonstrate key differences in box turtle thermal biology and highlight suboptimal thermal characteristics in degraded prairie and forest habitat that should be considered in prairie restoration and management for T. ornata conservation.","PeriodicalId":54821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Herpetology","volume":"57 1","pages":"92 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Herpetology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1670/22-016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Prairie habitat loss in the United States has led to population declines in many prairie-associated species, including Ornate Box Turtles (Terrapene ornata). Northwest Arkansas is an intergrade zone between the prairie-dwelling T. ornata and the more forest-associated Three-Toed Box Turtle (Terrapene carolina). As such, limited information exists on the potential differences in physiology and thermal ecology between the two box turtle species and how those differences might influence their habitat use. We addressed gaps in our knowledge of the thermal and spatial ecology of T. ornata and T. carolina with a three-part study. First, we compared the thermal profiles of refugia, open, and vegetated microhabitats across degraded prairie, restored prairie, and adjacent forest macrohabitats using operative temperature models and a linear mixed effect model. Second, we measured total evaporative water loss of both species across a range of body sizes. Finally, we fitted a subset of turtles with iButton data loggers and monitored them in the field to examine carapace temperatures and habitat use. Operative temperature models recorded high, largely homogeneous temperatures across microhabitats in degraded prairie and heterogeneous temperatures across restored prairie microhabitats, while forest habitat maintained stable, cool temperatures. Both species exhibited similar evaporative water loss rates; however, T. ornata experienced a broader range of temperatures in the field. Terrapene ornata were exclusively found in prairie habitat, whereas T. carolina was often found in forested habitats and subsurface refugia. Our results demonstrate key differences in box turtle thermal biology and highlight suboptimal thermal characteristics in degraded prairie and forest habitat that should be considered in prairie restoration and management for T. ornata conservation.
草原退化与恢复对箱龟热生态的影响
摘要美国草原栖息地的丧失导致了许多草原相关物种的数量下降,包括华丽箱龟(Terrapene ornata)。阿肯色州西北部是生活在草原上的三角龟和生活在森林里的三趾箱龟之间的过渡地带。因此,关于两种箱龟在生理和热生态方面的潜在差异以及这些差异如何影响其栖息地利用的信息有限。我们通过三部分研究解决了我们对T. ornata和T. carolina的热和空间生态学知识的差距。首先,我们使用操作温度模型和线性混合效应模型比较了退化草原、恢复草原和邻近森林大生境中避难、开放和植被微生境的热分布。其次,我们测量了两个物种在不同体型范围内的总蒸发失水。最后,我们为一组海龟安装了iButton数据记录器,并在野外监测它们,以检查甲壳温度和栖息地的使用情况。运行温度模型在退化草原微生境中记录到高且基本均匀的温度,在恢复草原微生境中记录到不均匀的温度,而森林生境保持稳定的凉爽温度。两个物种表现出相似的蒸发失水速率;然而,T. ornata在野外经历的温度范围更大。彩苔(Terrapene ornata)只在草原生境中发现,而绿苔(T. carolina)则常见于森林生境和地下避难所。我们的研究结果揭示了箱龟热生物学的关键差异,并强调了退化草原和森林栖息地的次优热特征,这是草原恢复和管理中应考虑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Herpetology
Journal of Herpetology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Herpetology accepts manuscripts on all aspects on the biology of amphibians and reptiles including their behavior, conservation, ecology, morphology, physiology, and systematics, as well as herpetological education. We encourage authors to submit manuscripts that are data-driven and rigorous tests of hypotheses, or provide thorough descriptions of novel taxa (living or fossil). Topics may address theoretical issues in a thoughtful, quantitative way. Reviews and policy papers that provide new insight on the herpetological sciences are also welcome, but they must be more than simple literature reviews. These papers must have a central focus that propose a new argument for understanding a concept or a new approach for answering a question or solving a problem. Focus sections that combine papers on related topics are normally determined by the Editors. Publication in the Long-Term Perspectives section is by invitation only. Papers on captive breeding, new techniques or sampling methods, anecdotal or isolated natural history observations, geographic range extensions, and essays should be submitted to our sister journal, Herpetological Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书