Exploring Methodological Challenges in Deliberative Democracy

IF 0.6 Q4 SOCIOLOGY

COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-04-29 DOI:10.1163/15691330-bja10051

Francesco Veri

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses the current methodological debate within the field of deliberative democracy and provides some analytical suggestions about the research and methodological directions to analyze the field by considering theory falsifiability. The analysis follows three separate steps. First, the author specifies the field’s status regarding theory falsifiability. Then he classifies a purposive sample of scholars’ research in deliberative democracy into a specific methodological taxonomy. Finally, through configurational meta-analysis, he examines deliberative democracy considering the systemic turn. The results of the analysis suggest the use of mixed or set-theoretical methods are the most promising analytical approaches to examine the field from a theory falsifiability perspective.

查看原文本刊更多论文

探讨协商民主的方法论挑战

本文分析了当前协商民主领域中的方法论争论，并从理论可证伪性的角度对该领域的研究和方法论方向提出了一些分析建议。分析遵循三个独立的步骤。首先，作者明确了该领域在理论可证伪性方面的地位。然后，他将一个有目的的学者对协商民主的研究样本分类为一个特定的方法论分类法。最后，通过配置元分析，他考察了考虑制度转向的协商民主。分析结果表明，从理论可证伪性的角度来看，使用混合或集合理论方法是最有前途的分析方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Comparative Sociology is a quarterly international scholarly journal dedicated to advancing comparative sociological analyses of societies and cultures, institutions and organizations, groups and collectivities, networks and interactions. All submissions for articles are peer-reviewed double-blind. The journal publishes book reviews and theoretical presentations, conceptual analyses and empirical findings at all levels of comparative sociological analysis, from global and cultural to ethnographic and interactionist. Submissions are welcome not only from sociologists but also political scientists, legal scholars, economists, anthropologists and others.