Family First: Evidence of Consistency and Variation in the Value of Family Versus Personal Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Kuba Krys, June Chun Yeung, Brian W. Haas, Yvette van Osch, Aleksandra Kosiarczyk, Agata Kocimska-Zych, Cláudio V. Torres, Heyla A. Selim, J. Zelenski, M. Bond, Joonha Park, V. M. Lun, F. Maricchiolo, C. Vauclair, Iva Poláčková Šolcová, David Sirlopú, C. Xing, V. Vignoles, Wijnand A. P. van Tilburg, Julien Teyssier, Chien-Ru Sun, Ursula Serdarevich, Beate Schwarz, R. Sargautytė, E. Røysamb, V. Romashov, Muhammad Rizwan, Z. Pavlović, V. Pavlopoulos, A. Okvitawanli, Azar Nadi, Martin Nader, Nur Fariza Mustaffa, Elke Murdock, Oriana Mosca, T. Mohorić, Pablo Eduardo Barrientos Marroquin, Arina Malyonova, Xinhui Liu, J. Lee, A. Kwiatkowska, Nicole Kronberger, L. Klůzová Kráčmarová, Natalia Kascakova, İ̇dil Işık, E. Igou, D. Igbokwe, Diana Hanke-Boer, A. Gavreliuc, Ragna B. Garðarsdóttir, M. Fülöp, V. Gamsakhurdia, C. Esteves, A. Domínguez-Espinosa, P. Denoux, Salome Charkviani, A. Baltin, Douglas Arévalo, Lily Appoh, C. Akotia, Mladen Adamovic, Y. Uchida
{"title":"Family First: Evidence of Consistency and Variation in the Value of Family Versus Personal Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures","authors":"Kuba Krys, June Chun Yeung, Brian W. Haas, Yvette van Osch, Aleksandra Kosiarczyk, Agata Kocimska-Zych, Cláudio V. Torres, Heyla A. Selim, J. Zelenski, M. Bond, Joonha Park, V. M. Lun, F. Maricchiolo, C. Vauclair, Iva Poláčková Šolcová, David Sirlopú, C. Xing, V. Vignoles, Wijnand A. P. van Tilburg, Julien Teyssier, Chien-Ru Sun, Ursula Serdarevich, Beate Schwarz, R. Sargautytė, E. Røysamb, V. Romashov, Muhammad Rizwan, Z. Pavlović, V. Pavlopoulos, A. Okvitawanli, Azar Nadi, Martin Nader, Nur Fariza Mustaffa, Elke Murdock, Oriana Mosca, T. Mohorić, Pablo Eduardo Barrientos Marroquin, Arina Malyonova, Xinhui Liu, J. Lee, A. Kwiatkowska, Nicole Kronberger, L. Klůzová Kráčmarová, Natalia Kascakova, İ̇dil Işık, E. Igou, D. Igbokwe, Diana Hanke-Boer, A. Gavreliuc, Ragna B. Garðarsdóttir, M. Fülöp, V. Gamsakhurdia, C. Esteves, A. Domínguez-Espinosa, P. Denoux, Salome Charkviani, A. Baltin, Douglas Arévalo, Lily Appoh, C. Akotia, Mladen Adamovic, Y. Uchida","doi":"10.1177/00220221221134711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People care about their own well-being and about the well-being of their families. It is currently, however, unknown how much people tend to value their own versus their family’s well-being. A recent study documented that people value family happiness over personal happiness across four cultures. In this study, we sought to replicate this finding across a larger sample size (N = 12,819) and a greater number of countries (N = 49). We found that the strength of the idealization of family over personal happiness preference was small (average Cohen’s ds = .20, range −.02 to.48), but present in 98% of the studied countries, with statistical significance in 73% to 75%, and variance across countries <2%. We also found that the size of this effect did vary somewhat across cultural contexts. In Latin American cultures highest on relational mobility, the idealization of family over personal happiness was very small (average Cohen’s ds for Latin America = .15 and .18), while in Confucian Asia cultures lowest on relational mobility, this effect was closer to medium (ds > .40 and .30). Importantly, we did not find strong support for traditional theories in cross-cultural psychology that associate collectivism with greater prioritization of the family versus the individual; country-level individualism–collectivism was not associated with variation in the idealization of family versus individual happiness. Our findings indicate that no matter how much various populists abuse the argument of “protecting family life” to disrupt emancipation, family happiness seems to be a pan-culturally phenomenon. Family well-being is a key ingredient of social fabric across the world, and should be acknowledged by psychology and well-being researchers and by progressive movements too.","PeriodicalId":48354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221134711","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

People care about their own well-being and about the well-being of their families. It is currently, however, unknown how much people tend to value their own versus their family’s well-being. A recent study documented that people value family happiness over personal happiness across four cultures. In this study, we sought to replicate this finding across a larger sample size (N = 12,819) and a greater number of countries (N = 49). We found that the strength of the idealization of family over personal happiness preference was small (average Cohen’s ds = .20, range −.02 to.48), but present in 98% of the studied countries, with statistical significance in 73% to 75%, and variance across countries <2%. We also found that the size of this effect did vary somewhat across cultural contexts. In Latin American cultures highest on relational mobility, the idealization of family over personal happiness was very small (average Cohen’s ds for Latin America = .15 and .18), while in Confucian Asia cultures lowest on relational mobility, this effect was closer to medium (ds > .40 and .30). Importantly, we did not find strong support for traditional theories in cross-cultural psychology that associate collectivism with greater prioritization of the family versus the individual; country-level individualism–collectivism was not associated with variation in the idealization of family versus individual happiness. Our findings indicate that no matter how much various populists abuse the argument of “protecting family life” to disrupt emancipation, family happiness seems to be a pan-culturally phenomenon. Family well-being is a key ingredient of social fabric across the world, and should be acknowledged by psychology and well-being researchers and by progressive movements too.
家庭第一:49种不同文化中家庭与个人幸福价值的一致性和差异的证据
人们关心自己和家人的幸福。然而,目前还不知道人们对自己和家人幸福的重视程度。最近的一项研究表明,在四种文化中,人们更看重家庭幸福而非个人幸福。在这项研究中,我们试图在更大的样本量(N=12819)和更多的国家(N=49)中复制这一发现。我们发现,家庭理想化相对于个人幸福偏好的强度很小(平均Cohen ds=.20,范围−.02至.48),但在98%的研究国家中存在,73%至75%的国家具有统计学意义,各国之间的差异为.40和.30)。重要的是,我们没有发现对跨文化心理学中的传统理论的有力支持,这些理论将集体主义与家庭与个人的更大优先级联系起来;国家层面的个人主义-集体主义与家庭与个人幸福理想化的差异无关。我们的研究结果表明,无论各种民粹主义者如何滥用“保护家庭生活”的论点来破坏解放,家庭幸福似乎都是一种泛文化现象。家庭幸福感是世界各地社会结构的一个关键组成部分,心理学和幸福感研究人员以及进步运动也应该承认这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology publishes papers that focus on the interrelationships between culture and psychological processes. Submitted manuscripts may report results from either cross-cultural comparative research or results from other types of research concerning the ways in which culture (and related concepts such as ethnicity) affect the thinking and behavior of individuals as well as how individual thought and behavior define and reflect aspects of culture. Review papers and innovative reformulations of cross-cultural theory will also be considered. Studies reporting data from within a single nation should focus on cross-cultural perspective. Empirical studies must be described in sufficient detail to be potentially replicable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信