Efficacy of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Alone or in Combination with Ruxolitinib for the Treatment of Penn Class 3 and 4 Cytokine Release Syndrome Complicating COVID-19

W. L. Gluck, Wesley M. Smith, S. P. Callahan, Robert A. Brevetta, A. Stenbit, J. Martin, Anna V. Blenda, S. Arce, W. Edenfield
{"title":"Efficacy of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Alone or in Combination with Ruxolitinib for the Treatment of Penn Class 3 and 4 Cytokine Release Syndrome Complicating COVID-19","authors":"W. L. Gluck, Wesley M. Smith, S. P. Callahan, Robert A. Brevetta, A. Stenbit, J. Martin, Anna V. Blenda, S. Arce, W. Edenfield","doi":"10.33696/immunology.3.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Observations early in the viral pandemic of 2020 noted the resemblance between severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and the hypercytokinemic state of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) [1]. Conti and colleagues [2] have outlined the binding of COVID-19 to the Toll-like receptor with subsequent cytokine driven fever and pneumonitis, while in Kenderian’s [3] murine model of CRS, ruxolitinib abrogated the development of cytokine excess. Cao [4] reported faster clinical recovery with JAK inhibition and Capochiani’s RESPIRE trial reported an 89% overall response rate (ORR) with ruxolitinib therapy [5]. Discordant findings regarding JAK inhibition have been reported on the superiority of baricitinib plus remdesivir over remdesivir alone in shortening recovery times in hospitalized patients [6] while the randomized RUXCOVID trial failed to impact severe complications of the disease by adding ruxolitinib to standard of care [7]. Other groups [8,9] have reported inflammatory cytokine profiles along with evidence that elevated IL-6 and TNFα are strong predictors of disease severity and survival. While cytokine excess could be an epiphenomenal surrogate for another process, therapeutic strategies have evolved around addressing the excessive cytokine levels complicating a significant fraction of COVID-19 patients.","PeriodicalId":73644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cellular immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cellular immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/immunology.3.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Observations early in the viral pandemic of 2020 noted the resemblance between severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and the hypercytokinemic state of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) [1]. Conti and colleagues [2] have outlined the binding of COVID-19 to the Toll-like receptor with subsequent cytokine driven fever and pneumonitis, while in Kenderian’s [3] murine model of CRS, ruxolitinib abrogated the development of cytokine excess. Cao [4] reported faster clinical recovery with JAK inhibition and Capochiani’s RESPIRE trial reported an 89% overall response rate (ORR) with ruxolitinib therapy [5]. Discordant findings regarding JAK inhibition have been reported on the superiority of baricitinib plus remdesivir over remdesivir alone in shortening recovery times in hospitalized patients [6] while the randomized RUXCOVID trial failed to impact severe complications of the disease by adding ruxolitinib to standard of care [7]. Other groups [8,9] have reported inflammatory cytokine profiles along with evidence that elevated IL-6 and TNFα are strong predictors of disease severity and survival. While cytokine excess could be an epiphenomenal surrogate for another process, therapeutic strategies have evolved around addressing the excessive cytokine levels complicating a significant fraction of COVID-19 patients.
治疗性血浆置换或联合鲁索利替尼治疗Penn 3、4类细胞因子释放综合征合并COVID-19的疗效观察
2020年病毒大流行早期的观察发现,2019年严重冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染与继发性噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞病(sHLH)[1]的高细胞动力学状态之间存在相似之处。Conti及其同事已经概述了COVID-19与toll样受体的结合,随后导致细胞因子驱动的发烧和肺炎,而在Kenderian的[3]小鼠CRS模型中,ruxolitinib消除了细胞因子过量的发展。Cao[5]报告了JAK抑制后更快的临床恢复,Capochiani的respiratory试验报告了ruxolitinib治疗[5]的总缓解率(ORR)为89%。关于baricitinib + remdesivir在缩短住院患者恢复时间方面优于单独使用remdesivir的JAK抑制研究结果不一致[6],而随机RUXCOVID试验未能通过将ruxolitinib加入标准护理[7]来影响疾病的严重并发症。其他研究小组[8,9]报道了炎症细胞因子谱,并有证据表明,IL-6和TNFα升高是疾病严重程度和生存率的有力预测因子。虽然细胞因子过量可能是另一种过程的副现象性替代品,但治疗策略已经围绕解决使相当一部分COVID-19患者复杂化的细胞因子水平过高而发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信